The explanation is that as usual, the scores are being used for demagoguery rather than anything useful. If we stopped comparing apples and oranges the picture would be a lot different. Compare the results for Chinese students in China to students of Chinese extraction in the U.S. and there won't be much to talk about. In fact, Chinese-Americans might even have higher scores than students in China.
Do the same for the other ethnic groups. If there were scores for African countries, I guarantee you that blacks in the U.S would have an impresively higher average.
Someone in the UK told me that African (not African-American, but AFRICAN) students in the UK do better on average than native UK students.
I haven’t checked, but I would assume this is true, the person who told me this is British ( and Anglo-Saxon ).
Please explain: why is comparing the PISA test results an apples and oranges exercise?