Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rick Santorum now TRASHES candidates he SUPPORTED in September
RED STATE ^ | December 7, 2010 | Grassroots1773

Posted on 12/07/2010 11:27:00 AM PST by Moseley

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-92 next last
To: Moseley
I've known Rick Santorum since he was a congresscritter, years prior to his being elected a Senator.

We used to fly the same flight to DC for years, before he moved his family to DC.

He was a very sincere, honest, young congresscritter with real values.

Unfortunately, young Rick, the honest congresscritter, has lived too long in DC and has too much political dogshit on his shoes.

I think that the old saying, that laying down with dogs will earn you fleas, is too true.

I don't say he is corrupt, but he has certainly become more of a DC "Lifer" than a young man with principles.

21 posted on 12/07/2010 12:39:57 PM PST by USS Alaska
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kent C

Ricki Santorum is a wimpish Loser! Don’t ever consider him for a national office,EVER!


22 posted on 12/07/2010 12:52:13 PM PST by True Republican Patriot (May GOD Continue to BLESS Our Greatest President :George W. Bush!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Moseley
Well there are a few things here to think about....(1) I don't think there is anything wrong with him expressing his disapproval of a candidate...we all do it all the time, so why can't he? (2) He is a fine Republican, and was #3 in the Senate at one time, so maybe because his name has been thrown around for POTUS or VP, some people are trying to smear him already....(3) I live in PA. and was very happy with the Senator...I did however not approve of him throwing his weight for Snarlin Arlin, but there you have to go back to item (1)......so he isn't any different than any of the rest of us, is he?
23 posted on 12/07/2010 1:09:05 PM PST by HarleyLady27 (How's that change treatin ya now?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Moseley
Angle and O’Donnell stormed the “enemy” at their strongest points and put pressure on the Democrats on their home turf.

I believe those two... especially O'Donnell, kept the glare of media off Rand Paul, giving him some needed breathing room so he could steady his campaign against Conway. COD had better be on Rand's Christmas gift list.

24 posted on 12/07/2010 1:10:43 PM PST by ScottinVA (The West needs to act NOW to aggressively treat its metastasizing islaminoma!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Undocumented_capitalist
“I am not a witch” was certainly a FUBAR campaign item.

So was the "I am you!" ad.

Who wrote her stuff?

25 posted on 12/07/2010 1:12:47 PM PST by earlJam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Cicero
I blame Rove for that as much as anybody. Specter was predictably a disaster, and Rick lost the election for doing what he was asked to do by the party leadership.

We have to remember, though, it was 2006 -- a "wave" election -- that carried a lot of weight toward his loss. We lost a high number of GOPers that year. Plus.. Bob Casey disguised himself as a pro-life "moderate," giving PA voters an illusory alternative to Santorum.

26 posted on 12/07/2010 1:16:06 PM PST by ScottinVA (The West needs to act NOW to aggressively treat its metastasizing islaminoma!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ScottinVA

True. But I remember a lot of Freepers back before that election were saying that they refused to vote for Rick. And I was saying that Bob Casey was not his father’s son when it came to abortion, that he was lying on several issues, so they should hold their noses and vote for Rick. But they didn’t.

He made a big mistake agreeing to endorse Specter. But his voting record was good as long as he was in the Senate.


27 posted on 12/07/2010 1:37:53 PM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Moseley

YOu would have liked it better if he had said she had no chance of winning? No, he said exactly what people say when they are trying their best NOT to be fingered as someone who is hurting a candidate’s chances.

She was NOT a good candidate. She proved it. She may be a great person, but she has not been, and was not, and probably will never be, a good candidate for Deleware.

But she will enjoy playing with the almost $1 million she still has in the bank after her campaign ended.


28 posted on 12/07/2010 1:42:58 PM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cicero

If McCain turned against republicans in 4 years, and became a democrat, I doubt anybody here would hold it against Sarah Palin, so I don’t know why they don’t understand what you explained about Rick Santorum.

I don’t think he’s the best conservative in the world, but he seemed a good enough guy not to be dumped on by conservatives like he is.


29 posted on 12/07/2010 1:44:39 PM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: vette6387

Sharon Angle WAS electable, she simply made too many mistakes against a well-oiled democratic machine. Appealing to hispanic voters by telling them they look asian was probably just the last straw.

O’Donnell never had a chance, both because of her lack of any experience at all, and her inability to stand up to scrutiny, defend herself, and articulate a message. Which was wierd because she was a great speaker, she just didn’t speak the message.

When your first words to introduce yourself to the general election audience is “I am not a witch”, you have already lost the race. (I know, Nixon managed to come back after his “I am not a crook” speech, but that wasn’t a campaign advertisement, and it took a while).

But she never had a chance. She was 16 points down before she stepped out of the gate, and then she decided to hang around in the gate for 3 weeks, collecting millions and cementing “Senator Coons” in the voter’s minds.


30 posted on 12/07/2010 1:48:34 PM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Moseley

stupid is as stupid does.

Santorum must want the RINO insider support.


31 posted on 12/07/2010 2:10:45 PM PST by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator

“Gosh you guys. Maybe he is disappointed in the way she ran the campaign. He supported her when it counted and now thinks she either could have done better or ran a poor campaign. I don’t see why this is news or that he should be bashed...”

I agree with you entirely. Personally I thought O’Donnell was an inadequate candidate who had no chance of winning, but once she won the nomination you shut up, be a good team player, and get behind her and support her like Santorum did, no matter what you think, not throw stones like Rove or Krauthammer.

We’d be better off with half a conservative than no conservative at all. Castle was a lock to win, and had a 54% rating from American Conservative Union. Coons is 0% conservative with 100% chance of beating O’Donnell; O’Donnell is a 100% conservative with 0% chance of beating Coons. Either way it works out to Zero.

O’Donnell should have run for mayor of something and built at least a minimal record of achievement, not going straight from Kindergarten to the Major Leagues. Then go after the Senate slot when Castle retired.


32 posted on 12/07/2010 2:21:23 PM PST by lowtaxsmallgov (This Administration has absolutely no idea how to grow an economy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: earlJam

I don’t know who wrote her stuff. Worse yet, he/she got paid partially with money I sent to O’Donnell campaign :-(


33 posted on 12/07/2010 2:29:23 PM PST by Undocumented_capitalist (Obama&Pelosi are the killers in chief of the unborn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Undocumented_capitalist

Cheer up. Maybe O’Donnell’s advertising person does not have your money.

It was announced yesterday that she is still sitting on a million dollars of campaign donations.


34 posted on 12/07/2010 2:34:02 PM PST by earlJam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Moseley
Santorum has been on my no-buy list for a few years now. He's immature and overbearing. I've had enough of that sort of representation in my lifetime. We need real men (that's right -- I said men) at the helm.
35 posted on 12/07/2010 2:35:59 PM PST by Glenn (iamtheresistance.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #36 Removed by Moderator

To: CharlesWayneCT

Do you know if they are going to pursue charges against her or drop them since she lost?


37 posted on 12/07/2010 9:44:27 PM PST by Gondring (Paul Revere would have been flamed as a naysayer troll and told to go back to Boston.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Gondring

Whether a candidate has won or lost will have nothing to do with whether charges are pursued.

Charges will not be pursued because they are totally frivolous and without any merit.


38 posted on 12/07/2010 11:18:28 PM PST by Moseley (http://www.MeetChristineODonnell.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT
O’Donnell never had a chance, both because of her lack of any experience at all, and her inability to stand up to scrutiny, defend herself, and articulate a message.

This is where you are fundamentally mistaken, and you are the cancer destroying the country.

It is the party's responsibility to defend its candidate and defend the candidate.

That is your fundamnetal error. ALL candidates will come under attack from the other side, unless they pose no threat whatsoever. That is why you are what is wrong with politics in America.

There will never, ever, ever be a candidate who can simply sail into office without being attacked. You are foolish and naive for trying to find a candidate that will NOT be attacked. It will never happen.

Your attitude is a prescription for failure, 100% of the time.

It is the party's responsibility to defend its candidate.

Barack Obama has said all kinds of idiotic things.

See:

http://ObamaGaffes.org

Yet the Democrats circle the wagon and defend their candidate and refuse to allow attacks on Obama. They fight back.

But shallow and foolish Republicans like you form a circular firing squad AND GUARANTEE THE DEMOCRATS WIN.

It is your desire to have a candidatd that can rip power away from the statists WITHOUT ACTUALLY REQUIRING ANY *EFFORT* ON YOUR PART that is the cancer destroying the country.
39 posted on 12/07/2010 11:25:54 PM PST by Moseley (http://www.MeetChristineODonnell.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: earlJam
Who wrote her stuff?

Fred Davis was the campaign guru behind the "I'm not a witch ad." He was hailed as a genius, the best TV ad man in the entire GOP.

I hear that he is Sen. Inhofe's nephew.

But he was supposed to be greatest genius ever in campaign TV ads.

I hope that he never works again. I would hope that no one will ever hire him again for the rest of his life.


40 posted on 12/07/2010 11:30:07 PM PST by Moseley (http://www.MeetChristineODonnell.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-92 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson