Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Twenty-one Oxbridge colleges took no black students last year
Guardian ^ | December 6th 2010 | Jeevan Vasagar

Posted on 12/07/2010 3:38:36 AM PST by Cardhu

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last
To: Doc Savage

Agree. Bait-and-switch article, as it begins by saying no “Blacks” but then quickly switches to “CARIBBEAM Blacks.”


21 posted on 12/07/2010 5:58:20 AM PST by Hulka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: pieceofthepuzzle

The color bar and class distinction in Britain? Say it ain’t so.


22 posted on 12/07/2010 5:58:50 AM PST by Seruzawa (If you agree with the French raise your hand - If you are French raise both hands.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Hulka
Not so. To the Brits, Pakistan IS part of the Indian subcontinent. That's why I said about half of "asians" will be Hindus.

Iranians will usually be referred to "arabs" (even though they arent).

23 posted on 12/07/2010 7:08:00 AM PST by Vanders9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Vanders9

I guess all my Brit friends are wrong. Silly them.

And no, they do not consider Pak as part of the Indian sub-continent. They consider them a world apart from Indian, and you can bet the Pak and Indians agree.


24 posted on 12/07/2010 7:11:44 AM PST by Hulka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Seruzawa
“The color bar and class distinction in Britain? Say it ain’t so.”

The idea of European egalitarianism is ridiculous. In societies in which government has tried to alter economic disparity people find other ways of putting themselves into groups. In Britain it seems that social class is defined in part on the basis of how cultured or educated one is, or thinks one is. It's just another form of elitism.

25 posted on 12/07/2010 8:29:14 AM PST by pieceofthepuzzle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: pieceofthepuzzle
how many applied???
26 posted on 12/07/2010 8:36:12 AM PST by Chode (American Hedonist - *DTOM* -ww- NO Pity for the LAZY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Hulka

“Asian” has been since the 1950s the conventional colloquial usage in Britain to describe the peoples (of all religions and none) originating from the Indian sub-continent. The term covers, indiscriminately, Hindus, Sikhs, Muslims, Buddhists and others. It became current at a time when it was useful to distinguish between the two main groupings in the postwar wave of immigration from the “New Commonwealth”. The other main group, with which “Asians” were contrasted, were the “West Indians” - those deriving from the Caribbean. Incidentally, it was the latter group, rather than the Asians, who tended to be caricatured as the ‘bad immigrants’ (connotations of crime, drugs & sex etc) rather than the Asians, who were usually portrayed (at the time with some accuracy) as hard-working and law-abiding. It’s only in the last 15 years or so that this perception has changed.


27 posted on 12/07/2010 11:54:19 AM PST by Winniesboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: chadwimc

No it isnt.

In Britain, ‘Asian’ means either ‘South Asian’, that is those from the ‘Indian subcontinent’ (Indian, Pakistani, Bangladeshi, Goa) OR those from the Far East/Oriental areas.


28 posted on 12/07/2010 2:55:32 PM PST by the scotsman (I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Hulka

Hulka, sorry but you are wrong and I have to back my fellow Brits here. Americans and British interpret ‘Asian’ differently.

In Britain, ‘Asian’ means those from the Indian subcontinent (usually the phrase is South Asian or SE Asia) and that is India, Pakistan, Bangladesh and Goa. In Britain, we include Pakistan and Afghanistan as part of Asia, whereas you in America regard both as part of the ME.

‘Asian’ in Britain can also mean those whom would be called Oriental/Far Eastern: Chinese, Japanese, Thai, Koreans etc.


29 posted on 12/07/2010 2:59:42 PM PST by the scotsman (I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson