Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Armstrong Williams: Sarah Palin for president?
The Hill ^ | December 2, 2010 | Armstrong Williams

Posted on 12/03/2010 11:58:16 AM PST by EveningStar

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-76 next last
To: EveningStar
Sarah Palin would be a good excuse NOT TO VOTE for a half-black flaming eye rolling drooling Marxist..

A Marxist doing everything in his power to kill jobs, raise taxes, and deny domestic energy production..
AND make America look like a Chinese Fire Drill with the Three Stooges in charge..

Even Forest Gump knows that evil is as evil does..

21 posted on 12/03/2010 12:18:03 PM PST by hosepipe (This propaganda has been edited to include some fully orbed hyperbole....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003

I more than understand the concern you and people like pissant have with Palin. The problem is that many of us here, myself included, simply detest that the left and their corrupt MSM journ-o-list handmaidens have concocted a meme that Palin is an amiable dunce.

All candidates have shortcomings, but every single Republican candidate is press-molded into the “idiot” template in an effort to indellibly stamp and terminally marginalize.

As you know, they did it to Reagan, they did it to Quayle, they did it George W Bush. It is their standard disgusting way of attempting to ruin somebody and we tired of the same old operating procedure. It is time to STOP.

Sure Palin has short-comings but that doesn’t mean she not qualified.


22 posted on 12/03/2010 12:18:06 PM PST by Obadiah (BHO -- out the door in 4!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar

I think this post following the article nails it:

“It looks like Williams has caught a case of Palin Derangement Syndrome. If Palin wins the nomination, she’ll crush 0bama, for the simple reason that she will actually fight him tooth and nail. Any of the others, Huckabee, Romney, Gingrich, Christie, Pawlenty, will run a campaign very much like McCain, afraid to go after 0bama on anything for fear of being called a racist.

Palin hasn’t let any of the negative attacks on her slow her down a single step, every thing that has been thrown in her path, she has sidestepped, or leaped over, and has always moved forward.BY gah on 12/02/2010 at 11:21”


23 posted on 12/03/2010 12:19:51 PM PST by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: roses of sharon

Columnists just want readers.

Palin is a hot button issue.

If this primary season is like the 2008 one, we should see some candidates forming exploration committees sometime after the first of the year.


24 posted on 12/03/2010 12:20:53 PM PST by EveningStar (Karl Marx is not one of our Founding Fathers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003
I have learned it is pointless to point out what a disaster Mrs. Palin will be as a POTUS candidate — one ruinous to Conservatives across the board.

Goodness gracious, yes, because those who have been "deemed" qualified for office have done such a wonderful job. We definitely need to stay confined in that box.

25 posted on 12/03/2010 12:24:00 PM PST by upsdriver (Sarah Palin; the most intelligent politician of her time. :-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: 9YearLurker

“If Palin wins the nomination, she’ll crush 0bama, for the simple reason that she will actually fight him tooth and nail.”

#####

An excellent point.

And this type of courageous behavior will only serve as a multiplier, to further embolden the conservative rank and file.

Indeed, this has already been progressing, gloriously unchecked, since she exploded onto the scene in August, 2008.


26 posted on 12/03/2010 12:24:58 PM PST by EyeGuy (')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar

Sarah would be an excellent POTUS.

But she may not be a good candidate.


27 posted on 12/03/2010 12:25:49 PM PST by Retired Greyhound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar

28 posted on 12/03/2010 12:27:07 PM PST by SandRat (Duty, Honor, Country! What else needs said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EyeGuy

Another good point!


29 posted on 12/03/2010 12:28:40 PM PST by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar

Okay, what is he babbling about? That second paragraph bears absolutely no relation to reality.


30 posted on 12/03/2010 12:29:44 PM PST by RichInOC (Palin 2012: BOOM. Taste My Cluebat!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003

“I have learned it is pointless to point out what a disaster Mrs. Palin will be as a POTUS candidate — one ruinous to Conservatives across the board.”

They will either have to learn the hard way or perhaps Palin will surprise us in the end.


31 posted on 12/03/2010 12:30:23 PM PST by ari-freedom (Happy Chanuka!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: RichInOC

Like Limbaugh said....Sara qualified? NOOOOO...I want another 4 years of Obama. (sarcasm)


32 posted on 12/03/2010 12:31:19 PM PST by Blue Turtle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar
ineluctable

33 posted on 12/03/2010 12:42:02 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum (DEFCON I ALERT: The federal cancer has metastasized. All personnel report to their battle stations.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd
Armstrong Williams has proven himself to be a conservative. I’m sorry if his calling attention to the Hollywood theatrics of the Palin family has upset the DWTS fanatics.

Really? Seriously? If you don't like Sarah Palin, that's just fine, but you're a better FReeper than to try and push that kind of nonsense. It is beneath you.

34 posted on 12/03/2010 12:43:57 PM PST by perfect_rovian_storm (The worst is behind us. Unfortunately it is really well endowed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: RichInOC

How about that fifth paragraph? It could mean one thing but then again it could mean the opposite. On the other hand, maybe it’s the first one. Or not.


35 posted on 12/03/2010 12:44:15 PM PST by drubyfive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Spok

Except that it’s a lie. No mainstream media outlet is pushing Palin. They are doing every possible thing they can to stop it.


36 posted on 12/03/2010 12:46:20 PM PST by Durus (The distance between us has grown, and I struggle to quantify it. Windage adjustments are done.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd
"Armstrong Williams has proven himself to be a conservative. I’m sorry if his calling attention to the Hollywood theatrics of the Palin family has upset the DWTS fanatics."


It is much easier for some to resort to personal attacks than to refute the substance of his argument. Unfortunately the left has no monopoly on this tactic.
37 posted on 12/03/2010 12:46:45 PM PST by rob777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar

Is there any question but that Palin is the frontrunner? And that anyone who supports anyone else at this point—whether an Establishment RINO, a favorite son from your home state, or whatever—is aiming his or her fire at Palin and solely at Palin?

It really is quite amazing.


38 posted on 12/03/2010 12:48:13 PM PST by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar
I am supporting Sarah for the 2012 election run. Obama is a tragic failure. Time for someone like Sarah who has common sense and loves the truth. We need to restore America as one nation under God, not one slave pen under Obama the Islamo-Marxist-Chicago Mobster.
39 posted on 12/03/2010 12:50:05 PM PST by Armaggedon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Darth Reardon

Why doesnt he enlighten us with her shortcomings? I havent heard, apparently everyone knows but us dumb folks out in America.


40 posted on 12/03/2010 12:53:43 PM PST by GoCards (Why me? Why not me?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-76 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson