[allmendream]

I find it amusing that possibly the most pro-life and most conservative candidate with the possibility of winning the nomination in DECADES it thought by some to be SIMULTANEOUSLY unelectable, and not pro-life or conservative enough.

Yeah, I would like the see the over/under for the possibility of anyone MORE pro-life or MORE conservative winning the nomination.

And if that person not only existed, but entered the race and DID win the nomination, they are going to be more ELECTABLE?

Not even slightly logical.

[curth]

I find it amusing that possibly the most pro-life and most conservative candidate with the possibility of winning the nomination in DECADES is thought by some to be SIMULTANEOUSLY unelectable, and not pro-life or conservative enough.

---

I don’t think anyone really believes she is unelectable. Some are being lead to THINK she is unelectable due to the Journolist drivel and simply do not know any better. If the haters on both sides truly believed it, they wouldn’t be attacking her on a daily basis.

[BillM]

As I've pointed out on other threads:

To become president in 2013, the conservative candidate must raise $1,000,000,000 by the spring of 2012. It is that simple. It is on the critical path.

Who besides Sarah Palin has a chance to do this? Based on campaign financing rules it will require millions of hard working Americans to hit this number.