Skip to comments.
Prohibiting sex offenders from adoption ‘discriminatory’ says (UK) report
Life Site News ^
| December 1, 2010
| HILARY WHITE
Posted on 12/01/2010 2:05:07 PM PST by NYer
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-34 next last
1
posted on
12/01/2010 2:05:11 PM PST
by
NYer
To: netmilsmom; thefrankbaum; markomalley; Tax-chick; GregB; saradippity; Berlin_Freeper; Litany; ...
Just when you think it can't get any worse in Great Britain .... it does.
Catholic Ping
Please freepmail me if you want on/off this list
2
posted on
12/01/2010 2:05:59 PM PST
by
NYer
("Be kind to every person you meet. For every person is fighting a great battle." St. Ephraim)
To: NYer
wow... it gets worse and worse
I guess Muslims can marry their 9 year olds in public now.
3
posted on
12/01/2010 2:08:37 PM PST
by
GeronL
(http://libertyfic.proboards.com <--- My Fiction/ Science Fiction Board)
To: NYer
It is not wrong to discriminate against Sex Offenders where children are concerned.
4
posted on
12/01/2010 2:08:41 PM PST
by
DannyTN
To: NYer
Even if it’s discriminatory, so what?
5
posted on
12/01/2010 2:09:13 PM PST
by
WinOne4TheGipper
(Truman: The buck stops here. Obama: Buck? What buck? Did I tell you how it's all Bush's fault?)
To: WinOne4TheGipper
And the recidivism rate for Child Molesters is what?!!!!
6
posted on
12/01/2010 2:11:02 PM PST
by
massgopguy
(I owe everything to George Bailey)
To: NYer
And the band plays “The world turned upside down”
7
posted on
12/01/2010 2:11:09 PM PST
by
Cisco Nix
To: GeronL
Like that filthy ¨prophet¨ of theirs.
8
posted on
12/01/2010 2:12:23 PM PST
by
onedoug
To: NYer
And we wonder where our european worshipping leadership gets their crazy ass ideas...
9
posted on
12/01/2010 2:12:50 PM PST
by
FrankR
(Don't let the bastards wear you down!)
To: NYer
“If we believe that blanket bans are an effective and legitimate means to protect children then we should no more allow cohabiting couples to adopt or foster than convicted sex offenders,” she said. Indeed we should, Ms. Reece.
10
posted on
12/01/2010 2:12:50 PM PST
by
Tax-chick
(We know that terrorists are Moslems. I repeat, we know that terrorists are Moslems.)
To: NYer
11
posted on
12/01/2010 2:13:32 PM PST
by
markomalley
(Extra Ecclesiam nulla salus)
To: markomalley
“Great” Britain has become a total moral vaccuum. Put a fork in it.
12
posted on
12/01/2010 2:17:39 PM PST
by
Elpasser
To: NYer
EVERY DECISION is discriminatory to someone or something. Why cannot these ignoramuses get that straight?
Their decision to allow sex offenders to adopt is not discriminatory to the offenders---but guess what? It is highly discriminatory to the lives and well being of the children who may end up in the home of a sex offender!
vaudine
13
posted on
12/01/2010 2:18:20 PM PST
by
vaudine
To: massgopguy
100% if given the opportunity.
14
posted on
12/01/2010 2:18:25 PM PST
by
WinOne4TheGipper
(Truman: The buck stops here. Obama: Buck? What buck? Did I tell you how it's all Bush's fault?)
To: markomalley
I am a armed robber, who is it to deny me my right to income and employment? Thats discrimination!
...I am a terrorist
...I am a pedophile
worse yet,
I love goats and living in the past.....preferably about the 700’s... lets go raiding , looting, raping, plundering and we will tell them we are giving them religion....and they have to follow us in our style or we’ll kill them....
To: NYer; 185JHP; 230FMJ; AFA-Michigan; AKA Elena; Abathar; Agitate; Albion Wilde; Aleighanne; ...
Homosexual Agenda and Moral Absolutes Ping! Freepmail wagglebee to subscribe or unsubscribe from the homosexual agenda or moral absolutes ping list.
FreeRepublic homosexual agenda keyword search
[ Add keyword homosexual agenda to flag FR articles to this ping list ]
FreeRepublic moral absolutes keyword search
[ Add keyword moral absolutes to flag FR articles to this ping list ]
There has to be some reason why the leftists love perverts, criminals, child molesters, as well as every aspect of the culture of death.
The only rational reason I can come up with is that they are demoniac. I'm open to suggestions, though.
16
posted on
12/01/2010 3:07:04 PM PST
by
little jeremiah
(Courage is not simply one of the virtues, but the form of every virtue at the testing point.CSLewis)
To: NYer
17
posted on
12/01/2010 3:10:23 PM PST
by
SumProVita
(Cogito, ergo...Sum Pro Vita. (Modified Decartes))
To: little jeremiah
I suggest that you are 100% correct.
18
posted on
12/01/2010 3:12:31 PM PST
by
SumProVita
(Cogito, ergo...Sum Pro Vita. (Modified Decartes))
To: NYer
“If we believe that blanket bans are an effective and legitimate means to protect children then we should no more allow cohabiting couples to adopt or foster than convicted sex offenders,” she said. Currently, there are very few remaining “blanket” restrictions on adoption and fostering in Britain. Single people, unmarried cohabiting couples and homosexual singles can all adopt.
Recently, however, some individuals have been refused because of their traditional religious beliefs . . .
I suppose the only remaining question is what will replace the United Kingdom when its collapse is complete.
19
posted on
12/01/2010 3:14:59 PM PST
by
madprof98
("moritur et ridet" - salvianus)
To: NYer
“Discriminatory”, yes. And very wise, too.
20
posted on
12/01/2010 3:22:30 PM PST
by
Sopater
(...where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is liberty. - 2 COR 3:17b)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-34 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson