Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Obadiah

BTW, I was in South Dakota a couple of years ago and noticed they had “flex fuel” gas (very high alcohol content) for well over a dollar less than regular. I did some math regarding the energy content of alcohol vs gasoline and the percentage of alcohol in the fuel and determined it was still cheaper to buy the “expensive” gasoline because of the significantly better mpg I could expect.

And if this subsidy goes away, I have a feeling flex-fuel will too, unless people will really be willing to pay more for significantly less energy.

All in all, this is a VERY good development.


13 posted on 11/30/2010 1:32:54 PM PST by RobRoy (The US Today: Revelation 18:4)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: RobRoy

Yes but there should be a way to phase out the law with provisions or mandates that specify increased domestic oil production coming on line for each ethanol plant that closes. We don’t want to just increase percentage f foreign oil !


41 posted on 11/30/2010 3:35:54 PM PST by aumrl (let's keep it real Conservatives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: RobRoy

While alcohol has a lower energy content than gasoline, a higher percentage of the energy is extracted during the combustion process. In the end, you still get less energy out of ethanol, but not by as much as it would seem if you only compare energy contained, not energy released.


42 posted on 11/30/2010 3:39:08 PM PST by Darth Reardon (No offense to drunken sailors)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson