Posted on 11/30/2010 8:39:06 AM PST by RobinMasters
You don’t remember pundit Ann Coulter saying seriously that Hillary would have been a better choice than John McCain, and stronger on the ‘War on Terror’?
From 2008:
ANN COULTER: “She’s more conservative than he is. I think she’d be stronger on the war on terrorism. I absolutely believe that.... I will campaign for her if it’s McCain... She lies less than John McCain, she’s smarter than John McCain.”
ALAN COLMES: “Let me get this straight, would you vote for Hillary Clinton?”
COULTER: “Yeah.”
COLMES: “You would actually go into a voting booth...”
COULTER: “If it’s close and the candidate is John McCain, because John McCain is not only bad for Republicanism, which he definitely is, he is bad for the country, very very bad for the country.”
Coulter’s star is waning.
She is too anti-Palin, among other things.
Yeah, O’Donnell is a nitwit.
In this case, “identity politics” = Witches United.
Mischievous? Like a dry-humping ‘ho?
Wrong Bucko.
I have taken the pledge. No RINOs, and never a dem. I will write in the name of a person I consider a conservative before I would vote RINO or dem.
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1110/45722.html
But that doesn't mean O'Donnell wants to see Clinton become president. I love everybody in the Republican side who's even considering throwing their hat in the ring, so I'd be happy with any candidate who gets the Republican nomination,” she said.
That includes Sarah Palin, who she says shoots from the hip.”
Let's face it: You're not taking your meds again.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.