Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Tailgunner Joe

“No, this is clearly being done as an instrument of destabilization,” he says. “

I agree with Russia.

The question is ..who is behind it???

I think it is Obama.


3 posted on 11/29/2010 2:59:01 PM PST by RummyChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: RummyChick

I can see that. The threat is so great, new powers are required for safety and security.... or something along those lines.


6 posted on 11/29/2010 3:05:43 PM PST by mrmeyer ("When brute force is on the march, compromise is the red carpet." Ayn Rand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: RummyChick

Soros


7 posted on 11/29/2010 3:06:41 PM PST by ronnie raygun (V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: RummyChick

Hillary violated international treaties by ordering diplomats to spy. SHE IS TOAST. Obama will fire her as Secretary of State. Foreighn countries are gong to demand that heads roll: it will be Hillary’s head on a platter.

Obama knows that the Clinton Crime Syndicate has been stabbing him in the back for months. Payback is a bitch, or in this instance, payback ON a bitch.


8 posted on 11/29/2010 3:06:58 PM PST by SC_Pete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: RummyChick

How about the buy behind Obama, George Soros? He must have found a replacement! In Russia?


11 posted on 11/29/2010 3:09:58 PM PST by Paperdoll ( On the cutting edge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: RummyChick

“No, this is clearly being done as an instrument of destabilization,” he says. “

I agree with Russia.

The question is ..who is behind it???

I think it is Obama.

Reverce phycology so to speak?


12 posted on 11/29/2010 3:10:12 PM PST by munin (Enki did it, George Bush did it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: RummyChick
The question is ..who is behind it??? I think it is Obama.

It's one of two things: BO thinks he has more to gain than to lose by doing the leaking(i.e. the destruction of the country)....or he is so weak and incompetent as to be unable to stop the leaker. Neither is a good thing.

14 posted on 11/29/2010 3:12:28 PM PST by Mygirlsmom (Death Panels, Junk Panels.....what's Next???? Oh, Wikileaks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: RummyChick
Who is the one person who has dealt with all these parties.

Can you say Hillary???...Payback time!!

17 posted on 11/29/2010 3:16:18 PM PST by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: RummyChick
If it was Obama, we are sooooooo screwed. If he was involved there's only bad reasons.

Russians understand conspiracy... who knows, they might be right. It's a question of who benefits. Who gets stronger - who gets weaker? We know this much - whatever group is doing this is in bed with the New York Times... they were ready and willing to publish before the information was released...(right?)

23 posted on 11/29/2010 3:25:51 PM PST by GOPJ ('Power abdicates only under the stress of counter-power." Martin Buber /a Tea-nami's coming..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson