Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: blueyon
First, I see no difference between WikiLeaks and the New York Times, the Washington Post, or any other major US newspaper or media outlet that never hesitates to publish classified material when they get their hands on it. Heck, when the GOP is in power, there is awesome praise from the left for these newspapers for engaging in these "patriotic" activities.

Second, there are ways that the US could stop these activities, it is just the fault of the regime, which seriously believes that our enemies are civilized, normal people who would stop being bad if only we had a nice, long, talk with them, for not engaging in whatever clandestine actions are needed to prevent this information from being published. Or, to put it more simply, why doesn't Wikileaks publish any classified information from China or Russia?

3 posted on 11/28/2010 6:25:28 AM PST by pnh102 (Regarding liberalism, always attribute to malice what you think can be explained by stupidity. - Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: pnh102

Begs? What does Obummer want to hide? His administrations ineptness, arrogance? Hmmm...


8 posted on 11/28/2010 6:51:38 AM PST by alice_in_bubbaland (DeMint/Ryan 2012!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: pnh102
As utterly contemptible as the MSM's leaks are, they almost always contact the government prior to the publishing to give them a yeah but/chance to ask for at least part of the info not to be leaked. WikiLeaks is even more despicable.

Assange is committing multiple acts of espionage, an act of war. The man and his organization should be eliminate, not secretively, but publicly and very visibly.

32 posted on 11/28/2010 8:30:45 AM PST by Red Dog #1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

I went to the linked website and scrolled down through the replies. Tower7 posted a link that showed babies born deformed from materials in the bombs we are throwing at them. It is pretty awful and I suppose we should use “safer bombs and safer bullets” like we were admonished to do by some whack job a while back. A better solution would be for them to just stop fighting and surrender and I’ll bet ‘cha we would not drop another single bomb. Help me out here. Is this what Wikileaks is about?


39 posted on 11/28/2010 8:53:44 AM PST by Ditter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: pnh102



42 posted on 11/28/2010 9:09:05 AM PST by Chode (American Hedonist - *DTOM* -ww- NO Pity for the LAZY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: pnh102

If the government would execute traitors, especially politicians, we wouldn’t have this problem.


47 posted on 11/28/2010 9:39:08 AM PST by Terry Mross
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: pnh102
The owner of wikileaks has something big on Obama. Had this cr@p happened under a Reagan or some other ethical President with nothing to hide, there would have IMO been a black ops action to take the owner out, the site down and jailing of anyone in contact of classified information.

Something IMO is NOT known that wikileaks has over the Obama administration that is causing them inaction.

None of this makes sense.

65 posted on 11/28/2010 1:40:16 PM PST by A CA Guy ( God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson