Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Terpfen
"She's got a problem with Independents and she has a problem with Democrats," Rove said about Palin's rating with these groups.

So… Rove expects Democrats to vote for Republicans? Really? No wonder Bush kept pushing statist programs.

Palin has a problem with rats in that she unifies them. You should grasp this fact.

You realize that I’m not advocating on behalf of Palin, correct?

Apparently not.

I shouldn't be suprised after you criticize Rove and Bush that you also don't like Palin. Perhaps you prefer to spend your time on Freerepublic criticizing the former administration instead of the current rat President or rat majority in the Senate. Whether you are an anti-GOP conservative, is irrelevant to me. I merely wished to say that Rove doesn't expect "Democrats to vote for Republicans? Really?", but that Palin will motivate rats to the polls against her unlike Rudy, or Romney. I wasn't sure, from your response, that you understand what he was trying to convey.

Of course rats DO sometimes vote GOP. They voted GOP when they got tired of Carter and when they saw the anti-American side of the rats in 2004.

Who ever the GOP candidate is will be better than 0.

131 posted on 11/27/2010 8:37:09 PM PST by Once-Ler (ProLife ProGun ProGod ProSoldier ProBusiness Republican for Palin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies ]


To: Once-Ler
I shouldn't be suprised after you criticize Rove and Bush that you also don't like Palin.

Congratulations, two misinterpretations in a row! Because you’re pretty thick, allow me to spell out for you exactly what I’m saying:

1. Karl Rove is incorrect that a Republican presidential candidate needs Democrat crossover votes to win. They are most certainly helpful, as are any other form of vote, but due to inherent policy disagreements Democrats are unlikely to willingly vote for a Republican and so any form of Democrat support should not be sought on the part of a Republican candidate. If the candidate gets Democrat votes, great. If not, oh well. The handful of votes that would be acquired are not worth the amounts of campaign time and money necessary to secure them.

2. Rove’s past actions of having his candidate tailor policy and campaign rhetoric in order to help secure the votes of the opposite party ended in disaster. How many here lambaste GWB for not defending himself, or for the prescription drug plan, for TARP, or for any other policy meant to appease Democrats? It didn’t work. For Rove to come out and say that the 2012 candidate needs essentially do what GWB did is wrong and demonstrates an inability on Rove’s part to learn from his own failures, or to even perceive what is and isn’t a failure.

3. None of this is a reflection on the political viability of Sarah Palin as a presidential candidate. It is simply a refutation of Rove’s mindless “let’s give the Democrats most of what they want” campaign style. The end result of pretending to be a Democrat is the election of the genuine article. Reference Obama.

Do us both a favor and stop replying to my posts. Your lack of reading comprehension makes communication difficult.

Oh, and I like Sarah Palin. She has my vote over Romney, Suckabee, and Pawlenty.
132 posted on 11/28/2010 3:07:17 AM PST by Terpfen (Buh-bye, Suntan Charlie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson