[Candor7]

Obama may not be capable of destroying America on his own. But he has a few under him that are.Eric Holder is one,Janet Napolitano is another ,along with various other obscure fascists whose names have been secreted from the public: those who write bogus risk assessments for Homeland Security, based on political ideology for example, instead of genuine intel.

America must fight this now. We did not chose this battleground, nor did we chose the timing. This is the nature of such demographic warfare.

If we do not fight it now, and win, then we will not win at the ballot box and will be left to the sole remedy of our founding fathers.

IMHO Obama and the TSA need to be figuratively crucified on this.And it needs to happen ASAP. Custodial janitors without the status of law enforcement have no business violating the 4th amendment rights of Americans, perpetrating warrantless searches on us with no probable cause, all because the president has an ideology that classifies profiling and intelligence data as racist?

I say we get them now, and lay them low.Call it a pre-emptive strike. Call on all TSA workers to go on strike or resign for being required to perpetrate these crimes against innocent Americans.

Call for the impeachment and resignation of Obama, Napolitano and Holder. Pistole is being offered as a sacrificial lamb.His head is not enough.He will be replaced by someone worse.

Only those who fit the terrorst middle eastern profile should be required to be scanned or patted down. All of this search and assault crime by TSA is being perpetrated to avoid that strategic requirement. This idoicy will also guarantee that a terrorist attack over the holidays will be successful.SHAME!

This crime is not only wrong, it is designed to cover Obamas A$$ should an attack be successful, while guranteeing the success of an attack ( We can absorb an attack....Obama......we did all we could etc.....).

This is very serious business. The lives of many Americans depend on our turning this back to real security based on profiling and intel. The people's safety needs to trump presidential fascist political correctness.Right NOW there is no airport security.The gates are wide open for terrorists to succeed, a point lost on most in this scuffle.Get adults back in charge of the security of America.

These are NOT the people who caused 9/11, nor are they the type of person who perpetrated the terrorist attempts last Christmas and Thanksgiving:

These people constitute the risk, and that is data driven , even if politically incorrect, safety trumps ideology( America demands it.):

Political correctess has one assured result in war on terror: It gets you dead.The reason for this is that no facts can be designated as ignorable and still result in sustained safety of life. Data must be real, not politically made up.This is well known by Israel, which is why they do not use politcally correct security arrangements.

A SUCCESSFUL ATTACK ON AMERICA IS BEING INVITED AND ASSURED WITH TSA AS THE SCAPEGOAT.ITS THE ALINSKY WAY.

[pepperdog]

They had best do something very soon. Any idiot can see the long screening lines are a great target of opportunity just waiting for some enterprising jihadist to take advantage. Can you imagine the slaughter that could happen in a terminal like O’Hare...and probably on Thanksgiving eve or perhaps Christmas Eve. It is chilling to even think of the consequences of this poorly thought out policy.

[goat granny]

Hey, I want one of those burka’s. You never have to have a bad hair day ever again...also hides a woman's mustache and chin hairs..

[Red6]

We are a nation so concerned about the political correctness of things, so enamored with the idea of strength through diversity, so in love with the concept of equality over fairness that we can't see straight or make logical decisions anymore.

We will for sure become victims of our own stupidity.

Profiling works, as do interviews, and combined they work very well. In reality, while we deny this reality, Law Enforcement internally does spend a significant amount of it's resources on developing these skills because they know it's effective. Those that argue against it essentially are using an argument where they push it to absurdity. The reality is profiling as are interviews are based on intelligence and are dynamic, adjusting to the threat and information coming in. The counter argument pretends/assumes that this process would be static and purely race or national origin based, dumbing it down to make it appear ineffective........

[Cyber Liberty]

Those women are all committing sins that will get them stoned in an Islamic “Republic.” Can you spot the crime?
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
They aren’t wearing gloves. I can see their naked hands, and now I’m all turned on and stuff.