She was seen walking on water?
But, seriously, we don't know if this new material would help exonerate her or, quite possibly, involves evidence of further crimes.
That's what I'm wondering.
Does anybody know how she's regarded by the other Dims? The impression I get is that she's a b!tch.
They could be throwing her to the lions.
I would say that it's probably exoneration or at least a plausible excuse. That's the only good reason to delay.
If it was evidence of new crimes, the Democrats would want to push her through the ethics committee hearing whitewash and censure her like Rangel before the Republicans take over.
Then, the Republicans would be in a difficult position to initiate a new investigation over the same issue. Kind of like double-jeopardy: you can't be tried twice for the same crime.