Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Tea-Totaler (Scott Brown forgets who got him elected)
www.bostonherald.com ^ | November 11, 2010 | Hillary Chabot

Posted on 11/11/2010 5:48:27 AM PST by GOPsterinMA

U.S. Sen. Scott Brown — a sometime Tea Party darling who’s been tagged as a potential 2012 target after the Bay State’s Democratic landslide in last week’s elections — yesterday downplayed the importance of the controversial conservative movement and its new foothold in Washington.

“I’m not sure who they are,” said Brown when asked about the election of senators with reported Tea Party ties. Brown said he’s known U.S. Sens.-elect Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) and Pat Toomey (R-Penn.) before the election and, “They don’t come and say, ‘Hey, I’m a Tea Party member.’ They come and say, ‘Hey, I’m a U.S. senator representing my state.’ ”

Brown dismissed the Tea Party’s influence on the U.S. Senate despite national claims that self-described Tea Party candidates such as U.S. Sen.-elect Rand Paul (R-Ky.) represented wins for the growing grass-roots movement.

(Excerpt) Read more at bostonherald.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: brown4romney; brown4romneycare; republican; rino; romney; romneysurrogate; scottbrown; teaparty
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-190 next last
To: kittymyrib
"By the way, Brown, Rubio is a real conservative and will do just fine with his TEA Party base.

Rubio is more concerned with pleasing La Raza than upholding the Constitution.

161 posted on 11/11/2010 5:32:07 PM PST by Godebert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: USSR Didnt Fall

“The guy voted for the government takover bill which is as destructive as Obamacare is many respects. He is no republican let alone conservative.”

I’ll take it one step further......we knew little about Brown other than we thought he was a conservative in a liberal jungle. He really hasn’t shown me anything that would enable me to attest to his true attitudes toward serious issues.

In my opinion, any individual who would demean (thoughtlessly) his own daughters during his acceptance celebration is not the type of man I would befriend or trust.

EODGUY


162 posted on 11/11/2010 5:50:33 PM PST by EODGUY (Hold on to your copies of the Consititution of the United States. It is going to be re-written.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: chilltherats

You got that right.


163 posted on 11/11/2010 6:47:16 PM PST by GOPsterinMA (Massachusetts: like sh*t, it happens.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies]

To: GOPsterinMA

He won’t be the last.

Politicians always forget the people after a little time in DC.


164 posted on 11/11/2010 6:58:13 PM PST by CriticalJ (Suppose you were an idiot. And suppose you were a member of Congress.. But then I repeat myself. MT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CriticalJ

You got that right.

Also regarding Senator Snot: One of my Korean War buddies (who donated $) contacted his office ~5 months ago (and attempted two followups since) for assistance with the VA. Never one followup. Nothing. So much for serving his constituents.

As much of a dick as Ted Kennedy was, his office did get back to people.


165 posted on 11/11/2010 7:09:38 PM PST by GOPsterinMA (Massachusetts: like sh*t, it happens.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: CriticalJ

You got that right.

Also regarding Senator Snot: One of my Korean War buddies (who donated $) contacted his office ~5 months ago (and attempted two followups since) for assistance with the VA. Never one followup. Nothing. So much for serving his constituents.

As much of a dick as Ted Kennedy was, his office did get back to people.


166 posted on 11/11/2010 7:11:52 PM PST by GOPsterinMA (Massachusetts: like sh*t, it happens.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: GOPsterinMA

He’ll end up jumping to the Dems, that’s my prediction.


167 posted on 11/11/2010 9:01:48 PM PST by PaleoBob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PaleoBob

Interesting. I predicted he’ll go IND. Either way it’s for naught.


168 posted on 11/11/2010 9:43:21 PM PST by GOPsterinMA (Massachusetts: like sh*t, it happens.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies]

To: EODGUY
expecting a politician (left or right) to stop or even slow down on taxing us to death by talking to them, would be like expecting a tick to back out and stop sucking your blood after asking it to stop ....

aint gonna happen ever ( not brown, not palin, not nobody , no how ) its a runaway train on a path of total destruction

169 posted on 11/11/2010 10:11:30 PM PST by KTM rider ( Liberty is hijacked by the wealthy elite, US political system is their mercenary force)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies]

To: GOPsterinMA

This should come as no surprise to anyone....we all knew who Brown was from the get go....but this is what happens when we settle for getting behind the “anybody but” candidate because they are the lesser of the evils.


170 posted on 11/11/2010 10:46:48 PM PST by Kimberly GG ("Path to Citizenship" Amnesty candidates will NOT get my vote! DeMint, 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOPsterinMA

We should be the ones trying to forget we ever supported him.


171 posted on 11/11/2010 11:16:40 PM PST by TeachableMoment
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOPsterinMA

The tea party needs to come up with a really clever name for tea party betrayers like this guy. Then they need to label them as such, and run a candidate against them during the next election. The tea party needs to be very clear to all that this is what they intend to do.


172 posted on 11/11/2010 11:36:32 PM PST by Revel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grumpygresh

I think it is better to go with the States that a re not full blown communist like Mass. They will be on their knees begging for money soon. We should just say no.


173 posted on 11/12/2010 12:40:21 AM PST by screaminsunshine (Americanism vs Communism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Kimberly GG; TeachableMoment; Revel
Good points all.

Is he better than the alternative candidate was? Yes.

Was he the “41st” vote on ObamaCare? Yes.

Fine, he did what he was supposed to do. But he doesn't need to pretend that he doesn't know what the Tea Party is.

If he thinks “moderating” is going to get him re-elected in 2012, he's very mistaken. And people can quote all the outdated polls they want showing that Brown's the most popular politician in MA (wow, what an honor that is) - did he have the coattails to get ONE Republican elected in a statewide or Congressional race last week? No, not one. There's “popularity” in action.

174 posted on 11/12/2010 6:15:41 AM PST by GOPsterinMA (Massachusetts: like sh*t, it happens.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies]

To: KTM rider
I wish I could recall the origin of the comment, but I recall hearing a politician questioned about how long it takes for a newly elected legislator to cave once they arrive in Washington and forget their altruistic campaign promises and fall into the “go along to get along, Washington party” set.

The answer was two weeks.

EODGUY

175 posted on 11/12/2010 7:01:20 AM PST by EODGUY (Hold on to your copies of the Consititution of the United States. It is going to be re-written.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies]

To: Friendofgeorge

Still an improvement over Kennedy (and a better option than Coakley would have been), but he’s really a political wash and missing opportunities. He’s yet to do much as a Senator nor did he campaign much to help Massachusetts Republicans this past election cycle.


176 posted on 11/12/2010 9:03:27 AM PST by Moonlighter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: AU72

Brown served his purpose... - throwing egg in the Kennedy’s and Democrats’ faces back Jan 2010.

To that, we are grateful.

Now, he’s just what everyone should have expected him to be, just another northeastern neo-Liberal Senator.


177 posted on 11/12/2010 10:48:23 AM PST by The Bronze Titan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: GOPsterinMA

I voted for Brown for three reasons: 1) send a message and 2) try to block Obamacare, 3) avoid a far greater evil. Most MA conservative knew he was not a true conservative and that a true conservative would not have won. He did 1 and 3 and tried hard for 2. I wish he would have voted differently on some bills (especially financial reform) but his votes were not unexpected.

I am a TEA Partier and have been a social and fiscal conservative all my life (starting as ME co-chair of Youth for Goldwater). I will be supporting Scott Brown for re-election because of his support for Jeff Perry, the only candidate who had a decent shot at congress. Jeff is as conservative as I am, and far, far to the right of Scott, but Scott supported him 100%. I have no use for RINO’s who do not support conservatives even if they meet Reagan’s 80% voting threshold. Because Scott is in Massachusetts I will accept less than 80% as whatever it is, it will be better than 0%.

Sean Bielat is a nice guy and I wanted so bad for him to win, but realistically he had no chance and that may be part of the reason for Scott’s late support.

I think Scott understands that next time he will not be unique. Money poured in from all over the country and not just from TEA Partiers. TEA Party approval in Ma is an abysmal 13% and most of that is probably part of the equally small Republican registration. Scott was elected by much more than just a minuscule MA TEA party. Re-election will be vastly different as he will be one of many running and the Dems have awoken in MA and will be going all out.

All elected reps have to do things with an eye to getting re-elected - which is going to be next to impossible for Scott in MA. So all you anti-Browners, be prepared for Vicki Kennedy, or if you’re a mite luckier, Steven Lynch.


178 posted on 11/12/2010 11:31:03 AM PST by S.O.L.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presently no screen name

Your comment makes no sense. Scott Brown is the state’s most popular politician. It is a fact.


179 posted on 11/12/2010 12:52:29 PM PST by Dave W
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies]

To: presently no screen name

People can quote all the outdated polls they want showing that Brown’s the most popular politician in MA - did he have the coattails to get ONE Republican elected in a statewide or Congressional race last week? No, not one. There’s “popularity” in action.


180 posted on 11/12/2010 1:11:54 PM PST by GOPsterinMA (Massachusetts: like sh*t, it happens.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-190 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson