Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Can nothing kill the P-3C Orion?
Flight Global ^ | November 10, 2010 | Stephen Trimble

Posted on 11/10/2010 7:17:02 AM PST by sukhoi-30mki

Can nothing kill the P-3C Orion?

By Stephen Trimble on November 10, 2010

I am reporting in next week's magazine that a subset of the P-3C Orion fleet will outlive its planned retirement by the Boeing 737-based P-8A Poseidon. I'll post the link to the article here when it's available.

I consider the story a testament to the P-3C's record of freakish survival skills.

Adapted from the doomed, 1950s-era Lockheed L-188 Electra airliner, the Orion first survived its predecessor's untimely demise in the regional airliner market. It should have been replaced by the Lockheed P-7 in the early 1990s, but the P-7's setbacks and budget cuts kept the P-3C alive for at least another 30 years. Then, a series of inspections starting about 10 years ago nearly forced the navy to ground the entire fleet due to surprise revelations of fatigue damage. A rushed repair job called the special structural inspection kit (SSIK) kept about half the P-3C fleet in the air. But even that proved insufficient. During the last five years, wing inspections revealed shocking damage caused by corrosion and fatigue. By September 2009, all but 49 of the 120 combat-coded P-3C fleet was grounded. Only a furious effort by Naval Air Systems Command, led by P-3 sustainment lead Bob Holmes, allowed the navy to restore 33 Orions to flying status as of late October. Meanwhile, the navy is quietly investing to rewing at least 29 P-3Cs, allowing a subset of the Orion fleet to remain airworthy long after it is scheduled to be replaced by the P-8A.

Reports of the P-3C fleets demise, despite averaging 16,500 flying hours on an airframe designed to survive 7,500, are truly exaggerated.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aerospace; moffettfield; navair; orion; p3; usn
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-53 next last

1 posted on 11/10/2010 7:17:06 AM PST by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
Good post. Good bird.

Ahhhh, but the P2V Neptune..... Now THAT was an ASW patrol plane!


2 posted on 11/10/2010 7:22:17 AM PST by BwanaNdege ("a comeuppance is due the arrogant elites" - Charles Krauthammer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: magslinger

ping


3 posted on 11/10/2010 7:22:40 AM PST by Vroomfondel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Just watched one take-off and do a couple touch-and-gos this morning. Beautiful bird in the air with a great range, long flight time, and adaptability.


4 posted on 11/10/2010 7:23:28 AM PST by Rummyfan (Iraq: it's not about Iraq anymore, it's about the USA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

When as they come up with a better replacement for the P-3, the P-3 is toast.

This is not apt to happen any time soon.


5 posted on 11/10/2010 7:23:41 AM PST by null and void (We are now in day 659 of our national holiday from reality. - 0bama really isn't one of US.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Well I live on flight path over NAS Jacksonville...and I don’t know which number of Orion the Navy flies out of there, but I sure enjoy watching them. I guess it’s kind of the trhow back to another era.
Freegards,
Lex


6 posted on 11/10/2010 7:27:27 AM PST by lexington minuteman 1775
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BwanaNdege

Don’t forget the Hoover (S-3 Viking)!

Oh, I wonder if the new 737 can lope along on one engine the way the P-3 loiters on 2 props, at low altitude, in the salty sea air ...

Time will tell.


7 posted on 11/10/2010 7:28:37 AM PST by Blueflag (Res ipsa loquitur)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Rummyfan

They do touch and goes here in SE Georgia too. I work very close to the flightline and they are an awesome sight!


8 posted on 11/10/2010 7:32:01 AM PST by Conan the Librarian (The Best in Life is to crush my enemies, see them driven before me, and the Dewey Decimal System)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Blueflag
Yep, one of our church deacons used to fly one.

Lest we forget the "Stoof", here's a photo:


9 posted on 11/10/2010 7:36:35 AM PST by BwanaNdege ("a comeuppance is due the arrogant elites" - Charles Krauthammer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: BwanaNdege

Apparently there is a Neptune in the bottom of a freshwater lake in the Seattle Area and the Navy will not let aviation buffs pull it up and restore it.


10 posted on 11/10/2010 7:38:28 AM PST by DCBryan1 (FORGET the lawyers...first kill the "journalists". (Die Ritter der Kokosnuss))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Rummyfan

Used to watch these take off and land up at Brunswick NAS!


11 posted on 11/10/2010 7:39:33 AM PST by catman67
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Before the Navy left Moffett Field (Mountain View, CA), squadrons of P-3Bs would take off and fly right over our house on their way to ASW duty in the Pacific. The whole house would shake, vibrate and buzz. Maintenance on the planes would require they sit on the runway with engines at full throttle for what seemed like hours on end, blanketing the entire south bay in noise.

Great bird, but it is nice not having to listen to them anymore.


12 posted on 11/10/2010 7:42:47 AM PST by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Blueflag

I am not an expert but a quick look at the spects shows that the ‘737’ has a longer range by 350 miles and can stay on station an hour longer than the P-3.


13 posted on 11/10/2010 7:47:55 AM PST by SeeSac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
They are a very capable aircraft. They do their many jobs exceptionally well. Just because something is old doesn't means you should spend billions of dollars replacing it with something that may not be any better. The money would be better spent on more F22s or tanker aircraft...

Mike

14 posted on 11/10/2010 7:48:41 AM PST by MichaelP (It's a start!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BwanaNdege
For sheer awesome sound 72 cylinders


15 posted on 11/10/2010 7:52:35 AM PST by Oztrich Boy (History repeats itself, first as tragedy, second as farce - Karl Marx)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MichaelP
They are a very capable aircraft.

Except for that whole "wings about to fall off" thing.

16 posted on 11/10/2010 7:53:53 AM PST by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: SeeSac

I believe the specs, to a point ...

Turboprops are inherently more efficient at low altitudes. Perhaps the P-8 can carry a LOT more fuel, and thus has a longer patrol/loiter radius.

Perhaps new equipment and sensors will permit the P-8 to putz around at a nice fuel efficient 25,000 ft.

And perhaps the days of flying below the scud, in the rain and snow, actually LOOKING OUT THE WINDOW are over.

dunno.

Paint me anachronistic ;-)


17 posted on 11/10/2010 7:54:02 AM PST by Blueflag (Res ipsa loquitur)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Blueflag
They really ought to look at adapting one of these:

Composite, so corrosion would be much less of a problem.

STOL, so with folding wings you could even get in on/off a flat top.

Burt Rutan's ATTT

The Model 133-4.62 ATTT proof-of-concept demonstrator is a 62% scaled version of an airplane designed to challenging STOL and long range requirements. The ATTT was developed and test flown by Scaled under contract to DARPA.

http://www.scaled.com/projects/advanced_technology_tactical_transport_attt

18 posted on 11/10/2010 7:57:05 AM PST by BwanaNdege ("a comeuppance is due the arrogant elites" - Charles Krauthammer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom

I grew up in the South Bay, and P3s flying over every five minutes was part of the daily routine.


19 posted on 11/10/2010 8:03:38 AM PST by Disambiguator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Oztrich Boy
I think this is the bird I guarded in a hangar at NAS Norfolk in 1966. Charcoal gray with "US Navy" and "7" in black as the only markings.

Not ASW, but neat, nonetheless!


20 posted on 11/10/2010 8:17:04 AM PST by BwanaNdege ("a comeuppance is due the arrogant elites" - Charles Krauthammer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-53 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson