Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: JohnHuang2

I didn’t know what to think after 2008. The voters didn’t realize that after Joe the plumber, that Obama really was interested in spreading the wealth around? Didn’t it imply that Americans gave up on capitalism and were ready to embrace a new socialist country?
The problem was that Republicans such as DeLay, Bush and McCain didn’t quite the make the case for free markets and limited government either. Obama wins the debate by default.

The tea party came along and said “forget about what those republicans did. That’s not what we believe. This is the constitution, this is what it says and this is what we are for and will fight for.” Americans needed to be educated by the tea party because many of them forgot what this country was founded on and needed someone to remind them.


4 posted on 11/05/2010 1:22:05 AM PDT by ari-freedom (Ding dong the Pelosi is gone!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: ari-freedom

The Left talks about the spreading the wealth around. But when they’re asked to do it, they take a walk.


5 posted on 11/05/2010 1:35:08 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: ari-freedom
The voters didn’t realize that after Joe the plumber, that Obama really was interested in spreading the wealth around?

C'mon, the MSM painted Joe as one of those zany, right-wing, small businessmen with questionable tax payments. What did he know about economics, other than to be made out to be a strawman for Obama to tear down?

10 posted on 11/05/2010 6:23:58 AM PDT by Lou L (The Senate without a fillibuster is just a 100-member version of the House.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson