-—”So, tell me why I should be getting all tingly about a RINO that paints the Republican Party as a pack of arrogant corporate elitists?”
So what you’re saying is, “Unless I get my way (e.g. get a non-RINO conservative), I don’t want it” — WHICH MEANS YOU’RE SAYING YOU WOULDN’T VOTE FOR A BOXER OPPONENT AND THEREFORE YOU’D RATHER HAVE BOXER.
Be realistic for a change. (I live in Calif and anything we can do to get rid of that moronic Boxer, the better).
For twenty-five years, I went along with the "support the nominee" policy. Then came the Simon election. I have never seen such a screw job on the part of the Party in my life. Since that time, the CAGOP has refused to support a single conservative nominee for statewide office, not one. I'm not doing Charlie Brown any more. Got it?
Be realistic for a change. (I live in Calif and anything we can do to get rid of that moronic Boxer, the better).
In light of the content of that last post, do you see how ridiculous you look to me? For a change? I did that one for twenty-five years! I've had it with the complete lack of "moderate" reciprocity. No more.
My family has five generations in California. I've done more than just about anybody on this forum to roll back leftist policy, having written two books, deferred at least $1.25 million in income, and spent buckets of money in the proving that conservative policies can do a better job of environmental management. For you to say that without checking me out shows you to be shallow, lazy, and arrogant. Why should I listen to you?
I’m with you! Why is hell would we want one more minute with Boxer? She’s a liberal hack!