Obama, Holder and Dems will not be pleased.
1 posted on
10/29/2010 9:37:12 AM PDT by
jazusamo
To: jazusamo
To: jazusamo
Please bump the Freepathon and donate or become a monthly donor!
3 posted on
10/29/2010 9:47:31 AM PDT by
jazusamo
(His [Obama's] political base---the young, the left and the thoughtless: Thomas Sowell)
To: jazusamo
4 posted on
10/29/2010 9:47:32 AM PDT by
Edgerunner
(Second Amendment Spoken Here)
To: jazusamo
Obama, Holder and Dems will not be pleased.There's a bigger problem. Elena Kagan will not be pleased.
To: jazusamo
7 posted on
10/29/2010 10:05:59 AM PDT by
FrankR
(November 2nd is NOT an election - it's a RESTRAINING ORDER.....VOTE!)
To: jazusamo
A good deed for a lawyer to do right now would be to write a template pleading for a lawsuit over late absentee ballots that cites this case and mirrors its pleadings, and put it online. Have a form a soldier can fill out giving his name, county, state, where he's stationed, etc., mix that with a database and spit out pro se lawsuit paperwork that he just has to get to his county court if his absentee ballot is only a day late in 2012.
To: jazusamo
Deadlines that cannot be met because ballots are sent late cannot Constitutionally be applied. Every vote must count, provided all legally-enforceable requirements are met by the voter. Deadlines missed due to (in)actions of officials are not Constitutionally enforceable. That means ALL such votes must be counted, regardless of any deadlines--even if that means decertifying an election result or even unseating an office holder who has been wronguflly sworn in because of an change in the outcome of the election.
13 posted on
10/29/2010 10:28:09 AM PDT by
sourcery
(Don't call them "liberals" or "progressives." The honest label is extreme anti-Constitutionalists!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
