Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

O, Congress and the other defendants must respond by Nov 3? Day after the election? Is anyone following this?
1 posted on 10/26/2010 8:22:54 PM PDT by Frantzie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Frantzie

So many false starts. I’d like to believe something will happen, but it’s difficult. I have to admit I gave up following the details of all this stuff a while ago.


2 posted on 10/26/2010 8:28:21 PM PDT by Jack Black ( Whatever is left of American patriotism is now identical with counter-revolution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Frantzie

Won’t zero and his entourage be in India?


3 posted on 10/26/2010 8:28:25 PM PDT by neodad (USS Vincennes (CG 49) "Freedom's Fortress")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BP2; Fred Nerks; afraidfortherepublic

What do you know about this ???


12 posted on 10/26/2010 9:01:41 PM PDT by Tennessee Nana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Frantzie

The Wash Times dates u lists are paid ads right?


15 posted on 10/26/2010 9:25:23 PM PDT by bushpilot1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Frantzie

        
No. 10-446
Title:
Charles Kerchner, Jr., et al., Petitioners
v.
Barack H. Obama, President of the United States, et al.
Docketed: October 4, 2010
Lower Ct: United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
  Case Nos.: (09-4209)
  Decision Date: July 2, 2010

~~~Date~~~  ~~~~~~~Proceedings  and  Orders~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Sep 30 2010 Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 3, 2010)



~~Name~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~    ~~~~~~~Address~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~   ~~Phone~~~
Attorneys for Petitioners:
Mario Apuzzo 185 Gatzmer Avenue (732)-521-1900
Jamesburg, NJ  08831
apuzzo@erols.com
Party name: Charles Kerchner, et al.
Attorneys for Respondents:
Neal Kumar Katyal Acting Solicitor General (202) 514-2217
United States Department of Justice
950 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Washington, DC  20530-0001
SupremeCtBriefs@USDOJ
Party name: Barack H. Obama, President of the United States, et al.

21 posted on 10/26/2010 10:28:26 PM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Frantzie

The current administration can use armed Black Panthers at polling stations.

This will go nowhere.

As long as Obama is in power, the people of the US have no standing.

None.


22 posted on 10/27/2010 1:20:06 AM PDT by NoLibZone (Homosexuals oppose diversity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Frantzie

There is no requirement that anyone respond to a petition for a Writ of Certiorari. Various parties are offered the opportunity to respond but they really don’t have to.
Doesn’t anyone remember Berg v Obama? That’s the appeal where everyone thought that Obama was going to have to show his birth certificate to Justice David Souter.
Obama not only didn’t show his birth certificate to Justice Souter, his attorneys did not respond to the petition at all.
When the defendant in a suit on appeal doesn’t respond, that’s the same as saying, “we trust the Supreme Court to meet in conference and to render a decision on this petition without any input from us.”


26 posted on 10/27/2010 7:02:24 PM PDT by jamese777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Frantzie

obumpa


28 posted on 11/02/2010 7:34:24 PM PDT by Dajjal (Justice Robert Jackson was wrong -- the Constitution IS a suicide pact.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson