Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Moseley

Here we go again.

The article completely forgets to mention the following:

“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion”

This means Congress (and any other state with this in their Constitution) cannot create a “Church of the United States” or a “Church of Virginia, Carolina, etc.”.

This also means no endorsements, and no government employee can represent the government as a particular religious embodyment. That’s a critical piece of Amendment I. The framing fathers were very clear about this to prevent a “Rule of the Bishops” scenario so prevalent in England at the time.

So, although government employees are free to practice and express their religious beliefs in their own personal lives as “John Q Public”, they are disallowed to use this relationship to endorse or “enhance” (i.e. religious favoritism) their standing as a government employee.


11 posted on 10/20/2010 10:51:35 PM PDT by BocoLoco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: BocoLoco

If the Founders wanted the establishment clause to forbid endorsements as well as establishments then wouldn’t they have wrote it that way?


21 posted on 10/20/2010 11:22:45 PM PDT by Tailgunner Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: BocoLoco

1. Welcome to FR

2. Looks like you won’t be collecting the $1000


24 posted on 10/20/2010 11:31:45 PM PDT by tatown (Obama is Kenyan for "I make love to a woman that looks like Patrick Ewing")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: BocoLoco

This means Congress (and any other state with this in their Constitution) cannot create a “Church of the United States” or a “Church of Virginia, Carolina, etc.”.

********************

That’s only at the Federal level, since it is a Federal ammendment to the federal constitution.

There were state churches if I remember ... I’m not that old!


32 posted on 10/21/2010 2:25:11 AM PDT by ROTB (Without a Christian revival, we are government slaves, or nuked by China/Russia during armed revolt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: BocoLoco
This also means no endorsements, and no government employee can represent the government as a particular religious embodyment.

No,that is false. The Constitution says "establishment." It means what it says. That is part of our problem. "Apple" does not mean "turnip."

Government may acknowledge God and religion, honor God in general terms, and individual politicians and government officials may freely engage in all religious activities.

Before the US Supreme Court had its own building, it met in a chamber in the Capitol Building. That same chamber was used on Sunday mornings for CHristian church servieces.

Any restriction on the free expression, activity, or indulgence of religion by or within government VIOLATES the Constitutional guarantee of the "FREE EXERCISE OF RELIGION."

It is a violation of the First AMendment to restrict in any way the exercise, expression, or practice of religion,

If there is any place in American life where religion is not welcome by law, then the free exercise of religion has been violated.
57 posted on 10/27/2010 4:06:44 PM PDT by Moseley (http://www.MeetChristineODonnell.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson