Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 10/20/2010 5:13:41 PM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Kaslin

This is another reason why I support Dr. Ron Paul for president. He is for ending the FED and bringing America back to gold and silver as money. If America did this five years ago the financial crisis wouldn’t have happened.


2 posted on 10/20/2010 5:17:59 PM PDT by citizenredstater9271
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Nothing, the thought of it alone would kill him.


3 posted on 10/20/2010 5:24:13 PM PDT by EGPWS (Trust in God, question everyone else)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

I’m sure he would have something intelligent to say.

While I, not being in the same league as Mr. Feedman, am utterly speechless.


6 posted on 10/20/2010 5:27:46 PM PDT by Westbrook (Having children does not divide your love, it multiplies it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

I think Friedman would be very fascinated by the Fed’s policy, but I think he’d be much more concerned about the spread of socialism. No Fed policy is going to work if you’ve got the anchor of socialism weighing you down.


7 posted on 10/20/2010 5:43:00 PM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Bookmark.


8 posted on 10/20/2010 5:59:07 PM PDT by Sergio (An object at rest cannot be stopped! - The Evil Midnight Bomber What Bombs at Midnight)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Friedman always contended that expansion or contraction of the money supply was more important than interest rates. Interest rates indirectly influence the money supply in the economy by affecting how many times the dollars which are out there are lent and re-lent. The equation that Friedman discusses in “Free to Choose” and some of his other work is:
% Growth in Money Supply = % Growth in GDP + Inflation Rate

If the money supply grows faster than the GDP is capable of growing, then the extra money available results in inflation. Inflation was the chief problem in the late 1970s, when Friedman was at the peak of his fame. Today, as long as inflation remains low, there needs to be enough growth in the money supply to support economic growth. The real problem, however, which can’t be fixed by monetary policy alone, is that even with very low interest rates, there are not enough people who want to borrow money for business in the environment that Obama/Reid/Pelosi have created. Monetary policy can help fix a recession but it can’t fix the structural impediments that the left is putting on the economy.

I’m not a big believer in the idea that we should scrap the Federal Reserve and return to the gold standard, even though that idea is popular with some conservatives. There’s nothing inherently valuable about hunks of rare metals, other than people have generally wanted shiny things throughout history. In a modern economy, it is perfectly rational that the value of a nation’s currency should be set by the goods and services that people can buy with it. I don’t think the problem with our economy is that people can’t trade their money for a fixed amount of shiny metal. The problem with our economy is that we don’t make enough of the products and services that people want anymore. And the left keep raising more and more barriers for us to be productive again.


11 posted on 10/20/2010 6:17:10 PM PDT by CaptainMorgantown
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson