[Yet_Again]

1. The woman’s husband was shot.
2. There is a witness.
3. The lead investigator in Mexico was beheaded.

Clearly, she did not do this.

Now I understand that there are open border, free trade liberals among both parties who would desperately like to pin this murder on the wife so that they can go back to advocating for illegal immigration, lobbying for amnesty, and pretending that Mexico is one peachy place.

...but they are not American patriots.

[ScottinVA]

The lead investigator in Mexico was beheaded.

Given the state of affairs down there, that could've happened from one of a multitude of reasons.

[tallyhoe]

Remember they went after the Border Guards who shot a drug and human smuggler!!!

[BunnySlippers]

1. The killing of the investigator may not be related.

2. If you did want to kill your husband, this would be a great way to do it.

3. A body would help.

[BuckeyeTexan]

I didn't suggest that the wife murdered her husband. I said her demeanor indicates that she's lying about something. Who knows what that might be.

1. The woman’s husband was shot.

We do not know this is true. Her husband's body has not been recovered. Her husband is missing and presumed dead.

2. There is a witness.

There is no witness to the actual crime. The witness saw Tiffany returning to shore. He knows only what she told him.

3. The lead investigator in Mexico was beheaded.

True.

My doubts and questions have nothing to do with amnesty or securing the border. Tiffany Hartley is being deceptive, about what I have no idea. She's hiding or covering up something.