Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 10/18/2010 5:06:09 AM PDT by thackney
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: thackney
Anchorage Police who responded to the call said they would leave it to the District Attorney's office to decide whether to prosecute.

And the editor will consult with his attorneys about filing a civil suit against these @$$holes!

2 posted on 10/18/2010 5:09:14 AM PDT by BullDog108 ("There is no way to refudiate her strategery, so they misunderestimate her.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: thackney
Was this another "public town-hall" where recording was prohibited?
4 posted on 10/18/2010 5:09:49 AM PDT by BenLurkin (This post is not a statement of fact. It is merely a personal opinion -- or humor -- or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Liberal Blogger “Loses It” at Town Hall Meeting
http://joemiller.us/2010/10/liberal-blogger-loses-it-at-town-hall-meeting/

Obsession with Republican Nominee leads to physical assault, publicity stunt
Anchorage, Alaska. October 17, 2010 — Joe Miller released the following statement:

“While I’ve gotten used to the blog Alaska Dispatch’s assault on me and my family, I never thought that it would lead to a physical assault. It’s too bad that this blogger would take advantage of a “Town Hall” meeting to create a publicity stunt just two weeks before the election.”

The Miller campaign was required by the facility to provide security at the event. Even though Joe had spent nearly an hour freely answering questions from those in attendance, the blogger chased Miller to the exit after the event concluded in an attempt to create and then record a ‘confrontation’ with the candidate. While Miller attempted to calmly exit the facility, the blogger physically assaulted another individual and made threatening gestures and movements towards the candidate. At that point the security personnel had to take action and intervened and detained the irrational blogger, whose anger overcame him. It is also important to note that the security personnel did not know that the individual they detained was a blogger who reporting on the campaign. To them, the blogger appeared irrational, angry and potentially violent.


5 posted on 10/18/2010 5:10:14 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: thackney
I was feeling disgust towards Miller until I got to this part buried in the story:

After Miller walked away, Hopfinger said, he was surrounded by Miller supporters and security guards and felt threatened, so he pushed one of them away.

IOW, he wasn't handcuffed because he was "trespassing at the public event"

8 posted on 10/18/2010 5:13:28 AM PDT by Tribune7 (The Democrat Party is not a political organization but a religious cult.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: thackney

When conservatives were getting beaten and hospitalized by SEIU thugs at townhalls, there were NEVER any news stories, but let one commie get handcuffed by security after assaulting someone; the journalists jump in to blame the candidate.


9 posted on 10/18/2010 5:23:50 AM PDT by vikingd00d (chown -R us ./base)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: thackney

Put all those “journalists” in jail & Country will be better off.


10 posted on 10/18/2010 5:24:29 AM PDT by anita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: thackney
Ben Smith Covers For Irrational, Angry, Potentially Violent AK Dispatch Blogger

Joe Miller's Security Detail vs. The Alaska Dispatch

- JP

23 posted on 10/18/2010 8:08:36 AM PDT by Josh Painter ("Conservatism is not a candidate. It's a movement." - Jeffrey Lord)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: thackney

Well, let the lawsuits fly.


27 posted on 10/18/2010 9:05:17 AM PDT by CodeToad (Islam needs to be banned in the US and treated as a criminal enterprise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: thackney
This started to get a lot of airplay on KENI morning show.

Local caller put a cork in it by citing AK law and drawing a good parallel using a local mall and trespassing issues as an example.

Joe rented the building. Regardless of “public meeting’ or not - when asked to leave, you must comply or you will be trespassing.

It's not just a good idea, it's the law. AS 11.46.350. Definition. (a) As used in AS 11.46.300 - 11.46.350, unless the context requires otherwise, "enter or remain unlawfully" means to (1) enter or remain in or upon premises or in a propelled vehicle when the premises or propelled vehicle, at the time of the entry or remaining, is not open to the public and when the defendant is not otherwise privileged to do so; (2) fail to leave premises or a propelled vehicle that is open to the public after being lawfully directed to do so personally by the person in charge; or (3) enter or remain upon premises or in a propelled vehicle in violation of a provision in an order issued or filed under AS 18.66.100 - 18.66.180 or issued under former AS 25.35.010 (b) or 25.35.020. (b) For purposes of this section, a person who, without intent to commit a crime on the land, enters or remains upon unimproved and apparently unused land, which is neither fenced nor otherwise enclosed in a manner designed to exclude intruders, is privileged to do so unless (1) notice against trespass is personally communicated to that person by the owner of the land or some other authorized person; or (2) notice against trespass is given by posting in a reasonably conspicuous manner under the circumstances.

29 posted on 10/18/2010 9:37:24 AM PDT by ASOC (What are you doing now that Mexico has become OUR Chechnya?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: thackney
Oh bother - HTML is my friend - if used correctly.

This started to get a lot of airplay on KENI morning show.

Local caller put a cork in it by citing AK law and drawing a good parallel using a local mall and trespassing issues as an example.

Joe rented the building. Regardless of “public meeting’ or not - when asked to leave, you must comply or you will be trespassing.

It's not just a good idea, it's the law.

AS 11.46.350. Definition.

(a) As used in AS 11.46.300 - 11.46.350, unless the context requires otherwise, "enter or remain unlawfully" means to

(1) enter or remain in or upon premises or in a propelled vehicle when the premises or propelled vehicle, at the time of the entry or remaining, is not open to the public and when the defendant is not otherwise privileged to do so;

(2) fail to leave premises or a propelled vehicle that is open to the public after being lawfully directed to do so personally by the person in charge; or

(3) enter or remain upon premises or in a propelled vehicle in violation of a provision in an order issued or filed under AS 18.66.100 - 18.66.180 or issued under former AS 25.35.010 (b) or 25.35.020.

(b) For purposes of this section, a person who, without intent to commit a crime on the land, enters or remains upon unimproved and apparently unused land, which is neither fenced nor otherwise enclosed in a manner designed to exclude intruders, is privileged to do so unless

(1) notice against trespass is personally communicated to that person by the owner of the land or some other authorized person; or

(2) notice against trespass is given by posting in a reasonably conspicuous manner under the circumstances.

30 posted on 10/18/2010 9:39:48 AM PDT by ASOC (What are you doing now that Mexico has become OUR Chechnya?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: thackney
Miller's announcement last week that he would no longer answer questions about his character or his personal history.

I'm surprised more candidates don't adopt this approach:

"I'm running for office this year, right now and so I don't want to talk about what I did last year or the year before. My past is none of your business."

That could help knock down all the smears and ugly stuff in campaigns. Stick to the positive message about the future, not the past.

38 posted on 10/18/2010 1:58:10 PM PDT by Walts Ice Pick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: thackney

I am in Alaska and have lived here 18 years, here is the straight dope on this.

The very liberal reporter was out for a confrontation, wanted it publicized, he was basically acting like a suicide bomber, get close to Miller, get any reaction and create indecisiveness upon the voters, in this state elections are won or lost on a handful of votes, every one counts.

Its desperation, its also a salt the earth tactic as well, if the democrats cannot get the votes they will make sure the GOP won’t get them either, and in Alaska a lot of people are latent libertarians.

Traditionally we are Republican unless the GOP leans left, then we tend to distance ourselves until the GOP regains its right direction.


43 posted on 10/19/2010 5:27:56 AM PDT by Eye of Unk (If your enemy is quick to anger, seek to irritate him. Sun Tzu, The Art of War.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: thackney

Olbermann was ranting about this, calling Miller’s security detail a “militia”, etc. Queef didn’t say anything about the blogger assaulting a security guard, naturally.


48 posted on 10/19/2010 12:16:15 PM PDT by ozzymandus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson