Posted on 10/12/2010 8:20:37 PM PDT by only the truth
HE He,Ha Ha!!!!
I’ve often felt like taking a leak outdoors, particularly when I see those “environmentally sensitive aquifer recharge zone” warning signs. I figger if all sorts of animals are allowed to pee there, why shouldn’t I?
Just call me the thread party pooper. lol
As a backpacker, I’ve read several trail books, and I must say I was dismayed to read that the Grand Canyon has problems with human waste. Supposedly, people have to “carry it out”; can anyone confim this?
That would change the experience forever:
“Is the fire out?” “Got it!”
“Everyone packed and ready to go?” “Sir yes sir!”
“Are the feces secured?” (crickets chirping)
If Obama is allowed to do it on our Constitution, why can’t a hunter do the same thing in the woods?
“has taken precautions with that type of facility to prevent illness “
The proper outhouse will see a bag of lime sitting on a shelf. It keeps the amount of critters down.
“de minimus”
Sounds like AGE to me.
IIRC, “de minimus” has a legal meaning which translates to “too unimportant to be worthy of notice”.
The Judge also was kind in his indirect references to the circus that would ensue if any more efforts were expended on “the case of those who dumped in the woods”.
“Still, couldn’t this lead to a new Cabinet position? You know, the secretary of, well, nevermind “
What, a Sh!t Czar?
What happens in East Texas, stays in East Texas.
yes
“de minimus” has a legal meaning which translates to “too unimportant to be worthy of notice”.
And what i would hope is a federal judge would rule that the carbon dioxide human beings contribute to the atmosphere is: de minimus.
oh well. i was trying to make a joke.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.