The DOJ and the DOD shaft our Soldiers yet again.
NYC...is there any surprise there.
1 posted on
10/10/2010 12:35:34 PM PDT by
Marty62
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-57 last
To: Kathy in Alaska
Kathy, most on your canteen ping list would likely be interested in this development.
92 posted on
10/10/2010 5:34:33 PM PDT by
editor-surveyor
(Obamacare is America's kristallnacht !!)
To: Marty62
To a Democrat, the purpose of laws is to keep the opposition in check in regards to any political question, and all aspects of life are political to a Democrat. Any laws that don’t favor Democrats are unjust or not meant to be enforced.
93 posted on
10/10/2010 5:37:32 PM PDT by
dr_who
To: Marty62; editor-surveyor; ConorMacNessa; HiJinx; SandRat; mylife; BIGLOOK; txradioguy; ...
96 posted on
10/10/2010 6:30:57 PM PDT by
Kathy in Alaska
(~ RIP Brian...heaven's gain...the Coast Guard lost a good one.~)
To: Marty62; 3D-JOY; abner; Abundy; AGreatPer; Albion Wilde; AliVeritas; alisasny; ...
Now, I wonder why LIBERAL ol’ New York would do such a thing!
PING!
103 posted on
10/10/2010 10:08:02 PM PDT by
Tolerance Sucks Rocks
(Muslims are not the problem, the rest of the world is! /s)
To: Marty62
This is a direct result of some counties not being able to certify their vote from the primary election.
Blame the new machines and HAVA.
107 posted on
10/11/2010 4:04:42 AM PDT by
NY.SS-Bar9
(Life is hardly more than a fraction of a second. Such a little time to prepare oneself for eternity!)
To: Marty62
So what is the penalty and who enforces it?
108 posted on
10/11/2010 4:50:17 AM PDT by
Flint
To: Marty62
NYC...is there any surprise there.
As one who has to suffer under the reign of Emperor Bloomie, no, there is not an ounce of suprise here. Is there no-one with standing who could sue to force the distribution of the ballots? If those with standing are only those troops who are overseas, then surely a derivative suit brought by a friend-of-the-plaintiff" should suffice.
111 posted on
10/11/2010 5:34:37 AM PDT by
Oceander
(The phrase "good enough for government work" is not meant as a compliment)
To: Marty62; All
According to FVAP.gov, these are the states that requested a MOVE act waiver:
http://www.fvap.gov/reference/laws/waivers.html
When you click on each state, it will have the state’s waiver application and DOD’s response. A detailed explanation of the process the Department used in making the decisions as well as the particular explanation for each state.
To: Marty62
Immediately indict and issue arrest warrants for former New York Secretary of State Lorraine Cortes-Vazquez and current NY SOS Ruth Noemi Colon.
To: AdmSmith; Arthur Wildfire! March; Berosus; bigheadfred; Convert from ECUSA; dervish; ...
Thanks Marty62. The blame for this should be put directly on the shoulders of the Demwits in NY state, and needs to be hammered on by the hothead Pubbie running for governor.
According to the 2009 MOVE Act, a state must send out its military and overseas ballots 45 days prior to elections. New York was granted a waiver to this deadline by the Department of Justice and given an additional 15 days -- until October 1 -- to send out all its ballots. On October 5, New York State Board of Elections co-directors informed federal officials that the state had not fully met their extended deadline, according to an e-mail posted online at FVAP.gov, the website of the Defense Department agency tasked with overseeing military voting.
116 posted on
10/11/2010 6:12:52 AM PDT by
SunkenCiv
(The 2nd Amendment follows right behind the 1st because some people are hard of hearing.)
To: Marty62
The Republicans need to make this a political issue. They need to say what has happened and need to tell Republican voters to represent the soldiers in this election who are not able to vote by going to the polls. They are putting their lives out on the line for us every day.
117 posted on
10/11/2010 6:18:33 AM PDT by
truthandlife
("Some trust in chariots and some in horses, but we trust in the name of the LORD our God." (Ps 20:7))
To: Marty62; Beckwith; LucyT
If ever a Supreme Court Cert. Pet. was needed wih Mandamus in aid, it is this situation. WHY DOESN’T A VETERAN’S GROUP TAKE THIS TO SCOTUS????
123 posted on
10/11/2010 8:04:56 AM PDT by
Candor7
(Obama . fascist info..http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/05/barack_obama_the_quintessentia_1.html)
To: Marty62
they have no morals or conscience
127 posted on
10/11/2010 9:16:53 AM PDT by
tutstar
To: Marty62
Would this have any Clinton fingerprints?
To: Marty62
This is a direct result of the State being unable to certify the election until weeks after the primary.
New machines (Required under HAVA) and untrained poll workers are to blame.
135 posted on
10/11/2010 10:21:56 AM PDT by
NY.SS-Bar9
(Life is hardly more than a fraction of a second. Such a little time to prepare oneself for eternity!)
To: Marty62
Deliberate.
After the election, they will go before a judge and say since the ballots were mailed late, the deadline for returning them should be moved back. A judge will agree.
The Dems will now have time to flood in enough fraudlent mail ballots to throw the election to whoever they want.
139 posted on
10/11/2010 11:28:33 AM PDT by
Brookhaven
(The next step for the Tea Party--The Conservative Hand--is available at Amazon.com)
To: Marty62
AS OF NOON TODAY THEY STILL HAVEN’T BEEN MAILED. ny TIME
140 posted on
10/11/2010 11:49:41 AM PDT by
Marty62
(marty60)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-57 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson