To: HereInTheHeartland
You’re living in the 1980’s ,, the note you signed (between 1998 and 2007/08) was 96% of the time fraudulent in that the true counterparty was never named on the doc and the actual cash money lender is not bound by the doc but by a seperate agreement to which you are not a party and never were a party.
The exception being if your note was through a small hometown bank that actually funded their own loans.
To: Neidermeyer
The last 3 I have signed were to the lender who funded them and now services them.
They do mention tha the loan could sold off (securitized), but my terms won't change.
19 posted on
09/30/2010 5:38:52 AM PDT by
HereInTheHeartland
(Add some short, faux intellectual phrase here:)
To: Neidermeyer
The last 3 I have signed were to the lender who funded them and now services them.
They do mention the the loan could sold off (securitized), but my terms won't change.
20 posted on
09/30/2010 5:39:10 AM PDT by
HereInTheHeartland
(Add some short, faux intellectual phrase here:)
To: Neidermeyer
Prior to, and during the American Revolution estimates by historians suggest that supporters of the rebellion numbered at about 45 percent while the “Loyalists” or “Tories” represented about 20 percent.
That left about 35 percent who remained neutral. It’s interesting trying to look for parallels in modern day America.
22 posted on
09/30/2010 6:54:16 AM PDT by
Chunga85
("Foreclosure Fraud", TARP, "Mortgage Crisis", Bailout)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson