Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: econjack

How much more obvious could the whole Liberal agenda be? They vote against the default language this nation has used from its beginnings. And then most of the same vote to further bankrupt the already dead-end program called Social Security. Why? It has nothing to do with fairness (how fair is it - when I will ultimately pay in FAR more than I will every take from Social Security - and my children will be paying for TODAY’s checks to illegals....).

It is all 100% about pandering for votes. It is high-time we showed them the kind of votes they are buying -— votes right out of office.


6 posted on 09/28/2010 9:11:08 AM PDT by TheBattman (They exchanged the truth about God for a lie and worshiped and served the creature...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: TheBattman

Exactly. If I take what I paid in SS over the years, plus my employers’ contributions and figure I could have earned an average of 3% on that money for 43 years, at current benefit levels, I need to live to 127 to break even. My guess is that I’m going to leave some money on the table.


8 posted on 09/28/2010 9:16:01 AM PDT by econjack (Some people are as dumb as soup.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson