To: nuconvert
If China expands its submarine fleet to 78 by 2020 as planned, it would be on par with the U.S. Navy's undersea fleet in quantity, if not in quality
During the Cold War, I can remember the Soviets having over 50 subs AT SEA at a given time. We found out quality matters far more than numerical superiority in submarine operations. Even in ten years, I doubt China will be able to match the technical/operational quality of US SSNs/GNs/BNs. It's a very slow learning curve.
14 posted on
09/27/2010 4:55:38 AM PDT by
Thrownatbirth
(.....Iraq Invasion fan since '91.)
To: Thrownatbirth
It’s something the clintons couldn’t sell to the Red Chinese.
To: Thrownatbirth
On top of that, we’re tracking them as soon as they leave port.
16 posted on
09/27/2010 5:22:36 AM PDT by
stuartcr
(Nancy Pelosi-Super MILF.................................Moron I'd Like to Forget)
To: Thrownatbirth
My Dad who was a sub driver pointed out that the US Navy has control of all the choak points. We have listening stations off of Iceland, south Africa, pretty much ever where. If a fork gets dropped on a chinese sub, we know it. I can remember back during the cold war, my dad's bosses were worried that the Russians couldn't be that stupid because we were tracking every one of their noisey subs. They thought they must have been putting a steel bar between the engine and the hull then pull the bar out and go silent when the balloon went up. Turns out they were just stupid and couldn't make a good submarine. Same thing is happening with china. China may fight India, may fight Russia, but it will be on land. Taiwan has nothing to worry about.
22 posted on
09/27/2010 6:08:20 AM PDT by
Delacon
("The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule." H. L. Mencken)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson