Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Hojczyk

Maybe New Spaniards, but not Mexicans. I believe Mexico would have been called New Spain before 1776.


18 posted on 09/21/2010 12:53:46 PM PDT by Unam Sanctam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Unam Sanctam
I believe Mexico would have been called New Spain before 1776.

Make that 1810 - the date when Mexico became independent of Spain.

The CIA World Fact Book (which 0bama must not have read) has the following entry for Mexico:

Independence:

16 September 1810 (declared); 27 September 1821 (recognized by Spain)

68 posted on 09/21/2010 1:07:06 PM PDT by reg45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: Unam Sanctam
Correct. It was New Spain until 1813.

In 1813, their declaration of independence was issued, under the name of America Septentrional or "Northern America" - in the sense of being the northern portion of Spain's former American possessions.

After years of war, Spain and America Septentrional signed a peace treaty in which the country was designated as the "Mexican Empire."

After two years of imperial rule, it became "The United Mexican States".

In 1836 the name was changed to the Republic of Mexico, and it has since been changed back to "The United Mexican States."

87 posted on 09/21/2010 1:12:33 PM PDT by wideawake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: Unam Sanctam
As I understand it, in 1810 Fr. Hidalgo started the Mexican war of independence, but it wasn't until 1821 that the Spanish finally retreated and Mexico became independent in fact.

A better case can be made that there were Spanish-speaking settlements in parts of what is now the USA, before the USA became a nation, just as there were some Franch-speaking and some Russian-speaking settlements. But small and few. The US southwest was far more Indian than Spanish. The vast, vast majority of Spanish-speaking New Spain colonists lived way south, south of the Sonoran Desert, down in central and southern Mexico.

104 posted on 09/21/2010 1:20:12 PM PDT by Mrs. Don-o ("Arriba, los pobres del mundo/En pie, los esclavos sin pan" -- etc. etc.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: Unam Sanctam

Even the Spaniards weren’t here in any number. Just a few small isolated settlements like Santa Fe and Los Angeles. The Commanche and Apache ruled north of the Rio Grande and they were a formidable barrier to any Mexican and Spanish presence. It took the US Second Cavalry years to subdue the Apache and Commanche. Mexicans were no match for them.


222 posted on 09/21/2010 9:24:35 PM PDT by Pelham (Islam, the mortal enemy of the free world)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson