Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: counterpunch

Newt is obviously a brilliant man, and probably a great debater, and yes probably better than Sarah. Problem is, he has no integrity, nor moral compass, and apparently no political principles that he stands by regardless what pain and suffering they might bring him. The fool sat on the couch with Nazi Pelosi FCOL and tried to sell us the crap sandwich we know as global warming, and endorsed Scozzafava who later endorsed the dem.

Newt might win the debate, but I wouldn’t vote him for even dog catcher. Sarah smokes him on everything that really matters.


29 posted on 09/19/2010 11:57:45 PM PDT by HerrBlucher (In the White House the mighty White House the Liar sleeps tonight.............)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]


To: HerrBlucher; Terrence DoGood

Newt has a role in brainstorming about ideas and (sometimes) challenging liberals on TV, but no one who cares about integrity and judgment and character should support him for higher office


33 posted on 09/20/2010 12:05:09 AM PDT by Enchante ("The great enemy of clear language is insincerity." -- George Orwell --)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson