Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. Rebukes Health Insurers
Wall Street Journal ^ | September 10, 2010 | JANET ADAMY

Posted on 09/10/2010 7:23:48 AM PDT by reaganaut1

The Obama administration on Thursday told health insurers that it will track those who enact "unjustified" rate increases linked to the health overhaul and may block those companies from a new marketplace for insurance coverage.

Kathleen Sebelius, secretary of Health and Human Services, issued the warning in a letter to Karen Ignagni, the insurance industry's top lobbyist.

Ms. Sebelius said some insurers were notifying enrollees that their insurance premiums will increase next year as a result of the law's new benefits.

The Wall Street Journal reported Wednesday that some carriers are asking for total premium hikes topping 20% starting this month, and the carriers are attributing one to nine percentage points of the increases to new benefit mandates in the law.

"There will be zero tolerance for this type of misinformation and unjustified rate increases," Ms. Sebelius wrote. "We will not stand idly by as insurers blame their premium hikes and increased profits on the requirement that they provide consumers with basic protections."

Ms. Ignagni, president of America's Health Insurance Plans, said: "It's a basic law of economics that additional benefits incur additional costs, and the impact on premiums depends on the type and amount of coverage policyholders had before." She attributed rising premiums to the higher price of medical services and the impact of younger and healthier people dropping their insurance during the weak economy, as well as the additional benefits required under the new law.

Beginning Sept. 23 or later, many new plans for individuals and small employers must begin letting children stay on their parents' insurance policies until age 26. These plans also face a requirement to eliminate co-payments for preventive care, give coverage to children regardless of pre-existing medical conditions and eliminate lifetime coverage caps.

(Excerpt) Read more at online.wsj.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Front Page News
KEYWORDS: bho44; bhofascism; democratcorruption; democrats; fail; fubo; healthcare; healthinsurance; liberalfascism; obamacare; sebelius; socialisthealthcare
"Zero tolerance" for "misinformation" as defined by the government -- what happened to the 1st Amendment? These bullies need to be made lame ducks in November.
1 posted on 09/10/2010 7:23:51 AM PDT by reaganaut1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

we’ll get you, and your little dog too...


2 posted on 09/10/2010 7:25:00 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

thugs


3 posted on 09/10/2010 7:26:18 AM PDT by jjw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Translation: “Tell the public the truth about ObammaCare and Rahm will make sure you sleep with the fishes!”


4 posted on 09/10/2010 7:29:58 AM PDT by In Maryland ("Impromptu Obamanomics is getting scarier by the day ..." - Caroline Baum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
The Obama administration obviously hasn't read the bill and if they did, they didn't understand it. They don't understand the relationship between Income, Expenses, and Profit.
5 posted on 09/10/2010 7:30:16 AM PDT by BaylorDad (Tea time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BaylorDad

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2_OzLHKFN5s


6 posted on 09/10/2010 7:32:09 AM PDT by terjon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

NAZI’s did the same thing to private business when they came in to power.


7 posted on 09/10/2010 7:35:26 AM PDT by LeonardFMason
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

“boot to the throat”


8 posted on 09/10/2010 7:36:46 AM PDT by Sacajaweau (What)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
"There will be zero tolerance for this type of misinformation and unjustified rate increases," Ms. Sebelius wrote.

Imo, she is creating policy that discriminates against insurers and deprives them of income, without the benefit of an enabling law.

9 posted on 09/10/2010 7:39:44 AM PDT by Tax Government (Democrat: "I'm driving to Socialism at 95 mph." Republican: "Observe the speed limit.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Simply based on the new requirements for all kinds of preventive care without any copays, the insurers will have to raise their rates, all things being equal. Then they are bullied about it, told they will be left out of the future of the industry. I pray that this 0bamacare disaster can be repealed before too much damage is done.


10 posted on 09/10/2010 7:40:07 AM PDT by NEMDF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
Soon to be enacted: the "Anti-Dog-Eat-Dog Rule" and "The Equalization of Opportunity Bill".

Ayn Rand knew these guys.

11 posted on 09/10/2010 7:44:56 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Don’t worry. Insurers will simply drop customers if they cannot operate at a profit.


12 posted on 09/10/2010 7:59:21 AM PDT by pnh102 (Regarding liberalism, always attribute to malice what you think can be explained by stupidity. - Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Insurance is regulated by State Insurance Commissioners.

Another usurpation by the Federal Government?


13 posted on 09/10/2010 8:01:21 AM PDT by sodpoodle (Despair; man's surrender. Laughter; God's redemption.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

So one of Obama’s Soviet Commissars has spoken. What’s next? The gulags? What a bunch of gangsters that inhabit the WH. Outrageous!!!!!!!!!!


14 posted on 09/10/2010 8:07:19 AM PDT by RichardW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

“shut up and take it.”
Tnx,
Barky.


15 posted on 09/10/2010 8:07:24 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks (Impeachment !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tax Government
If you can’t sell a product for what it costs you to deliver you quit, which is what Obama and Ms Succubus want to happen.
16 posted on 09/10/2010 8:21:05 AM PDT by dblshot (Insanity - electing the same people over and over and expecting different results.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Did they really think that eliminating the pre-existing condition restrictions was going to decrease risk? Come on!


17 posted on 09/10/2010 8:24:05 AM PDT by marsh2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
Let's see.

Some of the largest employers in the US are health insurers. Let's threaten and attack them. Typical of this regime.

18 posted on 09/10/2010 9:09:25 AM PDT by Gabrial (The Whitehouse Nightmare will continue as long as the Nightmare is in the Whitehouse)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog

Wow, veiled threat from Uncle Sugar.

I don’t even recognize my own country any longer.


19 posted on 09/10/2010 9:12:35 AM PDT by servantboy777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BaylorDad

The Obama administration obviously hasn’t read the bill and if they did, they didn’t understand it. They don’t understand the relationship between Income, Expenses, and Profit.”

1. They clearly didn’t read the bill. Queen Nancy would not give them the bill to read—& it was over 2500 pages.

2. Queen Nancy clearly told us all that ‘we would find out what was in the bill AFTER it was passed”. Hardly a transparent transaction in this Congress.

3. The number of Congress members who have any hands-on kind of business experience running a company & signing payroll checks every payday is minimal.

The situation will never improve until the voters start electing people who are NOT attorneys & find candidates who have business backgrounds.

It is interesting to me that while Congress is overwhelmingly occupied by attorneys, crime & appropriate punishment in the country is in big trouble. Gangs—drugs—welfare fraud—tax fraud—corruption at the highest levels continues to get worse. Los Angeles Mayor tells us that his city is safer than it was in the 70’s. I lived there in the 70’s. He is a LIAR.


20 posted on 09/10/2010 10:16:08 AM PDT by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson