Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Bigtigermike

Good for Sarah. Some poll said Sarah’s endorsement was practically meaningless? You just keep believing that. Palin bashers seem live on nothing but a steady diet of self-delusion.

Palin 2012 baby.


11 posted on 08/31/2010 7:16:00 PM PDT by toddausauras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: toddausauras

Palin 2012 baby
______________________________________________________________

FOR SURE!!!


15 posted on 08/31/2010 7:22:51 PM PDT by no dems (To Every Democrat in the U.S. House and Senate: "Shame, shame. Shame on all your houses.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: toddausauras

“Good for Sarah. Some poll said Sarah’s endorsement was practically meaningless?”

This does raise Sarah Palin stock - but after all, this was Alaska and Palin has had a very high approval rating there. The question is not whether Gov. Palin can win in Conservative states, but whether she can cobble together enough purple states to win the POTUS 2012 and whether voters in those states after having been SHELLSHOCKED by Obama’s total inexperience and pathetic actuals (we all knew what was going to happen) will swing to the right and elect a relatively inexperienced Palin to the highest office in the land, or will they put someone like Jim DeMint in there who has more federal experience, and whose Conservative stock is also rising (which a very nice satchel of Senate Conservative Fund victories including Miller also).


44 posted on 08/31/2010 7:33:48 PM PDT by SeattleBruce (Pray 2 Chronicles 7:14! God, Family, Church, Country - 11/2010, 11/2012 - Tea Party like it's 1773!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson