Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jla; mkjessup; stephenjohnbanker; DoughtyOne; AuntB
The point though, is lost on you.

The only "point" you tried to make was a vicious personal attack against me at #45 in which you explicitly suggested that I would end up in a padded room in a mental institution for failing to cease my opposition to McCain (see #34, the post replied to by yourself).

As far as I am concerned: one, McCain is still a treasonous bastard who has consorted with Communists, Islamic terrorists, and leftists of all stripes, behavior that is wholly unacceptable and wholly unforgiveable for anyone claiming the mantle of conservatism; two, McCain is still in office; and, three, McCain still needs to be held accountable.

It appears that point is lost on you, since you claimed at #68 that "what [I am] doing," i.e., my opposition to and attacks on McCain based on McCain's record, do not constitute "'fighting liberals'" (i.e., that McCain is not a liberal).

If you want to defend McCain by discouraging those who are willing to hold him to public account for his record (and yes, posting on FR does count as doing so) from doing so, then maybe this isn't the right place for you.

85 posted on 08/26/2010 8:00:52 PM PDT by rabscuttle385 (Live Free or Die)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies ]


To: rabscuttle385; jla; All
The point though, is lost on you.
The only "point" you tried to make was a vicious personal attack against me at #45 in which you explicitly suggested that I would end up in a padded room in a mental institution for failing to cease my opposition to McCain (see #34, the post replied to by yourself).


Typical behavior from just a liberal a**hole.

As far as I am concerned: one, McCain is still a treasonous bastard who has consorted with Communists, Islamic terrorists, and leftists of all stripes, behavior that is wholly unacceptable and wholly unforgivable for anyone claiming the mantle of conservatism; two, McCain is still in office; and, three, McCain still needs to be held accountable.

Absolutely. As it stands right now, there will be TWO Democrats on the Arizona ballot in November, McCain and whoever the 'Rat Party puts up against with McCain. It makes no difference who wins, there will still be a liberal-progressive 'Rat-scumbag representing Arizona, therefore McCain must go. Vote for his opponent. Throw his ass out.

It appears that point is lost on you, since you claimed at #68 that "what [I am] doing," i.e., my opposition to and attacks on McCain based on McCain's record, do not constitute "'fighting liberals'" (i.e., that McCain is not a liberal).

You're fighting liberals, you're dismantling 'jla' just fine Rabs, nice work.

If you want to defend McCain by discouraging those who are willing to hold him to public account for his record (and yes, posting on FR does count as doing so) from doing so, then maybe this isn't the right place for you.

Fixed that right up for ya Rabs, no charge.
110 posted on 08/26/2010 11:12:44 PM PDT by mkjessup ("Wait by the river and your enemies will float by" - old Japanese proverb, and I'm waitin'.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies ]

To: rabscuttle385

John McCain will never receive a vote from me. EVER

This is not a person who belongs in the U.S. Senate.

http://www.hotr.us/mccain/mccainagain.html


113 posted on 08/27/2010 10:28:46 AM PDT by DoughtyOne (UniTea! It's not Rs vs Ds you dimwits. It's Cs vs Ls. Cut the crap & lets build for success.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson