Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

14th Amendment never meant for illegals
Washington Times ^ | 8/24/10 | Gerald Walpin

Posted on 08/24/2010 5:36:59 PM PDT by Nachum

The suggestion by at least three senators that the Constitution be amended to deny birthright citizenship to children of illegal aliens born in the United States has induced derogatory retorts that to do so would negate the 14th Amendment's protection of civil rights. Historical facts - ignored by those opposed - in fact demonstrate that such an amendment would reinstate the rule as originally intended by the adoption of the 14th Amendment in 1868. At issue is the first clause of the 14th Amendment, which states, "All persons born ... in the United States, and subject to the

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 14th; amendment; illegals; never

1 posted on 08/24/2010 5:37:02 PM PDT by Nachum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Nachum
I have a feeling a window of opportunity to correct some of these perversions of the constitution will be opening soon.

If that happens this particular distortion needs to be among the first to be rubbed out.

2 posted on 08/24/2010 5:40:32 PM PDT by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

The 14th Amendment clearly was not intended about illegal immigrants.

In fact, illegal immigration was not even an issue at the time of the Amendment.

But slavery was and that is what the Amendment clearly was intended to mean and represent.


3 posted on 08/24/2010 5:41:34 PM PDT by Ev Reeman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stephenjohnbanker; wardaddy; AuntB

bttt


4 posted on 08/24/2010 5:42:10 PM PDT by Pelham (Islam, the mortal enemy of the free world)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

In 1868 I don’t think there was any such thing as an illegal alien was there?


5 posted on 08/24/2010 5:44:34 PM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
When the 14th Amendment was written, it was never considered that our country would become impotent when it comes to securing our borders. It has nothing to do with people who come here illegally.
6 posted on 08/24/2010 5:45:43 PM PDT by Frenchtown Dan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur
"In 1868 I don’t think there was any such thing as an illegal alien was there?"

I'm not sure what the genesis of that particular phrase is, or when it was coined, but the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882 predates US v. Ark by about 18 years or so. So, at the time Ark was heard & decided, there were classes of people that were disallowed entry into the US.

If there were Chinese who did enter anyways, I'm not sure what if anything was done to them. I don't know if any kind of deportation proceeding had yet been established.

7 posted on 08/24/2010 5:50:09 PM PDT by OldDeckHand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Frenchtown Dan
"When the 14th Amendment was written, it was never considered that our country would become impotent when it comes to securing our borders. It has nothing to do with people who come here illegally."

I'm not sure the Congressional record supports that assertion. During the debate on the 14th, Sen. Edgar Cowan gives a speech on the Senate floor where he's critical of the 14th Amendment because he feels it will lead to more Chinese and Gypsies in his state who commit "trespass". It's pretty clear that there were at least a few Senators who knew what the unwanted practical effect would be of the 14th, irrespective of what its intent actually was. They were right.

8 posted on 08/24/2010 5:56:31 PM PDT by OldDeckHand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: OldDeckHand

Lines from “Blazing Saddles”:

“Dock that chink a day’s pay for nappin’ on the job.”

“Alright, we’ll take the niggers and the chinks, but we don’t want the Irish.”


9 posted on 08/24/2010 5:58:52 PM PDT by Ev Reeman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: skeeter

“I have a feeling a window of opportunity to correct some of these perversions of the constitution will be opening soon.
If that happens this particular distortion needs to be among the first to be rubbed out.”

I sense you are on to something.

But, if the “14th Amendment [was] never meant for illegals”,

... might it also be said that the 1st Amendment was never meant for Muslims?


10 posted on 08/24/2010 8:41:35 PM PDT by Grumplestiltskin (I may look new, but it's only deja vu!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Grumplestiltskin
... might it also be said that the 1st Amendment was never meant for Muslims?

More like 'the first amendment was never meant to protect speech that presents a real and immediate danger to the republic', ie your typical muslim 'sermon'.

11 posted on 08/24/2010 8:48:51 PM PDT by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: skeeter
"14th Amendment never meant for illegals"

"I have a feeling a window of opportunity to correct some of these perversions of the constitution will be opening soon."

A Constitutional amendment will never happen ... unless the issue stays alive.

The best approach would be to challenge an illegal's birth certificate NOW, in state court.

It will be denied, of course, but appeal it to the SCOTUS.

There is a chance the SCOTUS will rule appropriately. If they don't, then there will be enough outcry to get the Constitutional amendment passed.

But do it NOW. God forbid one of the current conservative justices passes away and Obama gets to appoint another Elena Kagan to the court -- or, possibly, Hillary Clinton or Al Franken.

12 posted on 08/25/2010 2:52:28 AM PDT by tom h
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: OldDeckHand

Yes, they were right.

There are usually a few good ones that have foresight and object to a new law or ordinance, or have maybe a better way, but unfortunatley they are many times not the prevailing party.

Aside from that, it does not make sense to reward the illegal parents with citizenship and a free ticket for their kids. Especially when we are in a financial crisis and don’t have the money to build new schools for our own.

Mexico has to take care of it’s problems. They should not be our problem.


13 posted on 08/25/2010 7:31:08 AM PDT by Frenchtown Dan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: tom h
You're right - all tyhat needs to happen is a correct interpretation of the current amendment.

Its the only way, as the GOP hasn't the courage for a political solution.

14 posted on 08/25/2010 8:34:39 AM PDT by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson