Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: An.American.Expatriate

I wasn’t on FR.

You did not reply to any of my factual posts, that’s what I was referring to, while you did reply to other people.

You do not make your position clear. If you do, then it’s possible to have a discussion. If you do not clearly state your own position, such discussion is meaningless, all about poersonalities/posting styles and other useless junk.


441 posted on 08/20/2010 12:32:01 PM PDT by little jeremiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 436 | View Replies ]


To: little jeremiah

Thank you for the civil reply!

I think it is better we drop the line of discussion -
The discussion itself tends to be laden with emotion over reason and, I have seen a few areas where my line of reasoning leads to legal implications I find unacceptable and want to think about this a bit ... I would hope that others may do so as well (on both sides of the Government involvment in marriage argument, I could personally care less whether a gay living arrangement is called “marriage” as that, in the end, is just a word).


445 posted on 08/21/2010 3:07:57 AM PDT by An.American.Expatriate (Here's my strategy on the War against Terrorism: We win, they lose. - with apologies to R.R.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 441 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson