Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Captain Kirk
Perhaps but...that point is academic. Because such contracts were never formulated PRIMARILY BECAUSE OF THE ZONING RULES YOU WANT TO BROADEN......

Say what? I never advocated zoning over covenants. Thats a weak strawman argument, if ever I heard one.

We are stuck with what we are stuck with; primarily zoning boards and their non-democratic/non-representative decision making. If the choice is betweeen zoning boards and NOTHING, then I'll take the former with one caveat; we better make damn sure they make decisions that reflect the will of the people they represent.

BTW, if you really were a member of the real world you would recognize that the people allowing this mosque to be built are the same ones that wont let the Towers be rebuilt and the Greek Orthodox Church be rebuilt. Since we're not about to get rid of Zoning, its time to make them live out their charter.

112 posted on 08/18/2010 10:17:09 AM PDT by Nonstatist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies ]


To: Nonstatist

Say what? I never advocated zoning over covenants. Thats

I never said you did. Your view seems to be, to quote Malcolm X, to use “BY ANY MEANS NECESSARY” to selectivly stop this owner from building a mosque of his private property IMHO, that “by any means necessary” attitude a recipe for undermining not only property rights in a general sense but the rule of law. If I have incorrectly stated your position, please correct me.


132 posted on 08/18/2010 11:46:30 AM PDT by Captain Kirk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson