Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Investing For Mexico’s Social And Economic Collapse
The Market Oracle ^ | 8-13-2010 | Sean Brodrick

Posted on 08/13/2010 3:31:44 PM PDT by blam

Investing For Mexico’s Social And Economic Collapse

Politics / Mexico
Aug 13, 2010 - 08:05 AM
By: Sean Brodrick

There is a war next door, and our neighbor may be losing. I’m talking about Mexico’s ongoing battle with violent drug gangs. The northern parts of Mexico are becoming lawless, and the drug gangs are taking steps to set themselves up as de facto governments. This could have big implications for Mexico and for its oil production. And Mexico is our number 2 supplier of imported oil.

Does the fallout from Mexico’s collapse extend beyond oil? Heck, yeah! The U.S. share a long and porous border with Mexico, and troubles there are already spilling over here.

Here are some facts about Mexico’s drug gangs that are starting to scare me …

About 28,000 people have been killed since December 2006, when President Calderon declared war against the gangs. A whopping 1,200 people were killed in July — the deadliest month yet.
The city of Ciudad Juárez, which borders El Paso, has by far been the most violent area, with more than 4,300 people killed in the past two years. Drug gangs are armed with military-grade weapons smuggled from the U.S., and other weapons come straight from the Mexican army.

So many people were terrified of being assassinated in the last election, political parties had trouble finding candidates to run for office.

Drug gangs are smuggling more drugs into the U.S. now than when the war started. It has become a $39 billion a year business — worth one-fifth of the Mexican government’s annual budget.

The drug gangs are diversifying — moving into immigrant smuggling, extortion, kidnapping, and stealing oil. Mexican drug cartels operate in more than 2,500 U.S. cities. They are the only ones working in every part of the United States, and have forced out Columbian gangs.

Drug gangs are actually setting up de-facto shadow governments and levying taxes in the Mexican states of Tamaulipas and Coahuila on the Texas border, as well as President Calderon’s home state of Michoacán.

President Calderon acknowledged the growing strength of the drug gangs at a national security conference. He said: “Their business is no longer just the traffic of drugs. Their business is to dominate everyone else.
This criminal behavior has become a defiance to the state, an attempt to replace the state” by exacting war taxes and taking up arms more powerful than those used by outgunned government forces.

Mexican authorities are losing the battle against drug cartels.

Recently, the U.S. Joint Forces Command warned that the Mexican government could experience “a rapid and sudden collapse” due to drug cartel violence.

According to some experts, it’s so bad that Mexico’s government has been forced to pick sides, showing favoritism to certain drug gangs in return for help battling other drug cartels. Such alliances would be another step toward drug gangs becoming a political force.

There’s already a lot of non-official cooperation. In one notorious incident, a birthday party in the northern city of Torreon was attacked by drug cartel hitmen who used automatic weapons to kill 17 people and wound 18 others. Mexican authorities later said the hitmen were incarcerated cartel gang-members let out of jail by corrupt officials.
The prison guards lent the gunmen vehicles and their own weapons. After the bloody massacre, the killers coolly returned to the prison, handed back their weapons, and went back to their cells.

Stealing Big in Oil

The drug gangs are also stealing oil. Mexico’s state-owned oil company, Petróleos Mexicanos or PEMEX, estimates some $720 million worth of oil products were stolen from it in 2008, slightly higher than 2007.
Just one gang — busted in April — allegedly stole $46 million worth of oil products over two years.

And this year, the drug gangs branched out to threatening petroleum production, which provides one-third of Mexico’s revenue. PEMEX’s general director told a congressional committee that rampant kidnapping of workers forced the closing of oil and liquid gas plants in the Burgos Basin in northeastern Mexico, among the company’s most lucrative installations.

This is coming at a critical time, because Mexico badly needs investment in its oil industry …

Mexico’s supergiant offshore field Cantarell started declining in 2005, and crude output has fallen from an average of 3.4 million barrels a day in 2004 to about 2.6 million barrels a day over the last 18 months.
Meanwhile, PEMEX’s current top-producing field, Ku-Maloob-Zaap, has hit its expected peak production of 850,000 barrels a day.

In all, Mexico’s crude oil output was 2.592 million barrels a day in the first half of the year, down 1.4% from a year earlier.

If Mexico’s oil production falls again this year, it would mark six straight years of declines.

PEMEX hopes to issue up to 14 incentive-based contracts by the end of the year to get private sector assistance to develop mature oil fields. But if the drug gangs are stepping up the war, and targeting oil field workers, it’s hard to say who will want those contracts.

This, in turn, puts more pressure on the supply of crude oil to the U.S.

Other Economic Risks from the Drug War

Mexico’s economy is expected to grow by about 5% this year. That sounds good, except that Mexico’s economy shrank 6.5% last year.
So, the country’s GDP would still be lagging. It’s hard to get foreign investment in new factories when drug cartels are running rampant.

And Mexico is still feeling the pain from sovereign debt downgrades last year from two credit ratings agencies, leaving Mexico only one notch above the lowest investment grade (Mexico’s declining oil output was a key factor in the downgrades).
The debt downgrades make it harder for Mexico to borrow money. And bloodthirsty cartels running wild and shooting up the place won’t help bondholder confidence, either.

For me, the big risk here is a potential collapse of the Mexican government. If the drug gangs are able to set themselves up as viable shadow governments, then the U.S. may be forced to intervene militarily.

And that may not be the worst of it. As a student of history, I can tell you that one of the forces that brought down the Roman Empire was the immigration of large numbers of foreign tribes over its borders.
Those tribes all wanted the good life they saw in Rome, and they overwhelmed Rome’s ability to cope with them. If the Mexican government collapses, we could see a new flood of people heading over our border. In that case, Mexico’s problems could become our problems.

Bottom Line: 2 Ways to Play It

It looks like Mexico’s world of hurt is going to continue. You should start thinking about how you can protect your portfolio from the worst that could happen, and how you can profit in the meantime.

Investment #1: Crude Oil. Oil is still trapped in a trading range between $67 and $90, and I don’t see much that will break it out of that range in the near term. But the drug war is a threat to Mexico’s already fragile oil production, and Mexico is one of our biggest suppliers of foreign oil.
America imports 65% of its oil. So, the drug-gang violence is probably a long-term bullish force in oil prices. You can play that with an ETF that tracks the price of oil, like the PowerShares DB Oil Fund (DBO), or a fund that tracks energy stocks like the Energy Select SPDR (XLE).

I think a better way to play it is through oil stocks, funds and MLPs that pay nice dividends. America’s thirst for oil isn’t going away, and these stocks and funds pay you to hold them while you wait for oil to break out of its range. This is the strategy we’re using in Crisis Profit Hunter, and it’s paying off nicely.

Investment #2: A good defense stock. The best defense is a good offense, and if the Mexican government collapses, I expect we’ll see the U.S. intervene militarily.
That means all the defense stocks that have sold off in anticipation of U.S. troops leaving Iraq and Afghanistan may be real bargains.

If the Mexican government collapses, the U.S. might intervene militarily.

There are a couple of defense exchange-traded funds, but they aren’t liquid enough to trade in and out of. Instead, you might consider a high-quality defense stock like General Dynamics (GD). The company builds tanks and armored vehicles that the U.S would use in a major fight with the drug gangs.

And General Dynamics recently paid a 2.6% dividend yield. There is a lot to like about this stock.

Do Your Best and Leave the Rest

There are things we could do to stop the flow of people and drugs over our border. But that takes political will that appears to be lacking in Washington, which seems to be happy to put our troops along the borders of every country in the world except our own.

There are also things we could do to stop the rise of the drug gangs. But our government isn’t interested. I’m talking about legalizing marijuana, which accounts for 60% of the cartel’s income. That would cut the legs out from under the gangsters financially, but drug prohibition has a large and vocal constituency in the U.S.

Instead, we’ll probably continue to fight the drug gangs the same way we have for the last 40 years — and get the same results. So I guess my point is, if you’re looking for a better future out of this, you’ll have to find it yourself by making smart investments.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: drugwar; economiccollapse; mexico
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-45 next last

1 posted on 08/13/2010 3:31:47 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: blam

See this supportive information:

The Truth of Mexicos Civil War with Drug Cartels
Friday, August 13, 2010 3:58:50 AM · by Candor7 ·
El Blog Del Narco ^ | 13 August 2010 | Candor7

Warning, rogue ,graphic unedited multi media portal
operated at great risk by a Mexican computer security expert, in defiance of the Mexican Governments news media blackout, and the MSM spin here.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2569775/posts?page=65


2 posted on 08/13/2010 3:41:27 PM PDT by Candor7 (Obama . fascist info..http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/05/barack_obama_thela_quintessentia_1.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

I watched the biography of Pancho Villa the other night on History International channel. The present situation in Mexico is deja vu all over again. More than 1.5 million were killed in the Mexican revolution between 1910 and 1920.
Villa was a cruel and sadisitic S.O.B. He also operated on both sides of the border. The Mexican government was not in control of Northern Mexico 100 years ago, same as now.


3 posted on 08/13/2010 3:44:31 PM PDT by forgotten man (forgotten man)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

Sean Brodrick was very tired when he wrote this.


4 posted on 08/13/2010 3:59:52 PM PDT by casuist (Audi alteram partem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Colombia was like this back in the early 80’s to early 90’s, but they they turned things around. Still some stuff going there, but small potatoes compared to what is was then. There can be hope....


5 posted on 08/13/2010 4:12:04 PM PDT by Maringa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: blam

Bookmark!


6 posted on 08/13/2010 4:18:15 PM PDT by patriot preacher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

Well, the gangs took over the united States government and are now running it to suit themselves, from the white house on down.

The Mexicans are just not as sophisticated is the only difference.


7 posted on 08/13/2010 4:20:50 PM PDT by ravenwolf (Just a bit of the long list of proofs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ravenwolf

Best thing could happen to Mexico would be for us to invade them and restore law & order. (and their economy)


8 posted on 08/13/2010 4:33:14 PM PDT by Thom Pain (2 + 2 = 4 : Defending the Constitution is CENTRIST; not RIGHT WING! Don't be labeled!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Thom Pain

That would horrible for us, a near impossible mission and, if the cartels completely collapse the Mexican gov., something we would almost have to do.


9 posted on 08/13/2010 4:45:44 PM PDT by TigersEye (Greenhouse Theory is false. Totally debunked. "GH gases" is a non-sequitur.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: blam

The drug gangs are better funded than the Mexican government, and can buy and sell the Mexican government all day long. That means the drug war is lost before it is started.

The source of their funding is the US.

The best way to cut off that funding, besides a moral awakening here in the States, which is overdue, is to secure the border. Which we keep calling for. Nothing else will work. Anything else that might work won’t work if we don’t also secure the border. Other things are also necessary, but securing the border is fundamental.

Whining about the cost isn’t a solution. A failed state on our southern border is going to cost a whole lot more than a little barbed wire.


10 posted on 08/13/2010 4:52:58 PM PDT by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

It is only impossible in the ridiculous “politically correct,mushy,non-judgmetal world”;we need a modern Black Jack Pershing and George Patton.


11 posted on 08/13/2010 4:53:28 PM PDT by hoosierham (Waddaya mean Freedom isn't free ?;will you take a credit card?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: blam

A few years ago there was a report that the drug cartels control ovr 80% of Cancun’s tourist trade. As of now it most be much greater, to the point that the only hotels not either owned or controlled by the cartels or military are non-franchisee corporate owned hotel chains. And those chains are probably being extorted regularly.

The future might see a US military backed ‘Bay of Pigs’ like strategy to reclaim civil government under auspices of human rights under the UN (or NATO or the existing N.A. security cooperation agreement) oversight.


12 posted on 08/13/2010 4:54:48 PM PDT by JerseyHighlander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

No we wouldn’t. Just seal the darn border. It can be done if we have the will. Tanks and troops could do it until we put up a REAL barrier. Let Israel build it for us. They know how.


13 posted on 08/13/2010 4:55:00 PM PDT by Himyar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: marron

I agree with your premise, and and that the Fall of Man the USA might also have to legalise a host of illicit drugs to cut off the demand side of the equation.

Securing the physical movement along the border is a very expensive undertaking if the risk reward ratio is not drastically altered to reduce the rewards scenarios.

And if the USA doesn’t formalize some sort of guest worker program now, before the cartels forcibly block the pocketed Mexican Federal government from signing on, in an effort to protect the cartels human smuggling profit pipeline, it will never happen.

The USA does need the workforce in about ten years as the youngest boomer retire en masse, however the shortsighted politicians in this country care not about a decade from now, because they’ll have gotten theirs by then and retired to leave the aftermath to the next bloodsuckers to file election petitions.


14 posted on 08/13/2010 5:01:09 PM PDT by JerseyHighlander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: hoosierham
It is only impossible in the ridiculous “politically correct,mushy,non-judgmetal world”;we need a modern Black Jack Pershing and George Patton.

No, it would be nearly impossible because 1)the population would never support us, 2)Mexico is a huge country and 3)they would receive outside support from the likes of Hugo Chavez. As for "Blackjack" Pershing; his own words ought to put that myth to rest.

To: Texas Fossil
We had best find another officer like "Black Jack" Pershing.

So we can wander around Mexico for a year and fail our objective? Here's what Pershing himself said about it: ""when the true history is written, it will not be a very inspiring chapter for school children, or even grownups to contemplate. Having dashed into Mexico with the intention of eating the Mexicans raw, we turned back at the first repulse and are now sneaking home under cover, like a whipped curr with its tail between its legs."

28 posted on Friday, August 13, 2010 9:30:03 AM by Bubba Ho-Tep ("More weight!"--Giles Corey)

15 posted on 08/13/2010 5:11:26 PM PDT by TigersEye (Greenhouse Theory is false. Totally debunked. "GH gases" is a non-sequitur.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Himyar
No we wouldn’t. Just seal the darn border. It can be done if we have the will. Tanks and troops could do it until we put up a REAL barrier. Let Israel build it for us. They know how.

If Mexico fall entirely under the control of narco-terrorists that wouldn't be enough.

16 posted on 08/13/2010 5:12:47 PM PDT by TigersEye (Greenhouse Theory is false. Totally debunked. "GH gases" is a non-sequitur.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye
OK,let's go with the second guy ,George Patton.

Basically,we need someone in charge who recognizes that the truly evil can best be dealt with by killing them if at all possible.

17 posted on 08/13/2010 5:29:05 PM PDT by hoosierham (Waddaya mean Freedom isn't free ?;will you take a credit card?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: JerseyHighlander

“however the shortsighted politicians in this country care not about a decade from now, because they’ll have gotten theirs by then and retired to leave the aftermath to the next bloodsuckers to file election petitions.”

Is that not the exact risk of term limits? We the people need to remain vigilant no matter what happens!


18 posted on 08/13/2010 5:34:54 PM PDT by PreciousLiberty (In theory, theory and practice are the same. In practice, they're not.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: hoosierham

It couldn’t be done in a country like Mexico unless you want to attack it the way Patton attacked Germany. Even then it would be a problem for decades. No guerrilla army has ever been defeated on its own soil and that is what we would be facing.


19 posted on 08/13/2010 5:38:07 PM PDT by TigersEye (Greenhouse Theory is false. Totally debunked. "GH gases" is a non-sequitur.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: blam

Some Mexican local and unadvertised information:

The drug cartels are not ‘Mexican’, they are Columbian.T
They are the offshoots of the Medellin Drug Cartels that Columbia has succeeded in driving out.

They operate on the ‘Al Capone’ model; buy off judges and politicians, control and extort from local businesses, turn Mexican ‘indians’ who are hoping to get a job in the US and be able to eat, they take from these indigent persons and train them to be killers, soldiers in their drug mafia.

Why aren’t these cartels identified as Columbian?

The FBI is very well equipped to lend tactical, strategic, logistic and intelligence support to Mexico to wipe out these bastards. Why doesn’t Mexico ask for US FBI support?

To save face! What stupidity! They don’t want to be seen as having to rely on white America to get control of their northern regions. The southern regions around Mexico City are fine, well under control, strong law enforcement.

I recently suggested to a friend in Mexico City that they should ask the Columbians for help to ‘save face’. Problem is Columbia teamed with US FBI and intelligence services to rid themselves of their bastards. But the drug scum found northern Mexico to be easy for them to operate.

Damn how I wish we could send some of our finest delta forces into northern Mexico and capture, nail and hang the carcasses of these bastards in broad daylight.


20 posted on 08/13/2010 6:17:52 PM PDT by Hostage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-45 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson