1 posted on
08/10/2010 1:19:03 PM PDT by
Justaham
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-50 next last
To: Justaham
Charlie knows where the Democrat bodies are buried.
So does Maxine.
I think we should grant them full immunity and tell them to spill their guts.
2 posted on
08/10/2010 1:20:45 PM PDT by
E. Pluribus Unum
(The man who speaks to you of sacrifice, speaks of slaves and masters, and intends to be the master.)
To: Justaham
I Double-Dog dare you ....
3 posted on
08/10/2010 1:21:28 PM PDT by
Hodar
(Who needs laws .... when this "feels" so right?)
To: Justaham; Revolting cat!; Lucky9teen
Oh yeah?" "YEAAAAH!!!"
4 posted on
08/10/2010 1:22:12 PM PDT by
a fool in paradise
(I wish our president loved the US military as much as he loves Paul McCartney.)
To: Justaham
Keep talking Charlie. I love when you progressives bury yourself in the bull$hit you’ve deposited onto the American public.
6 posted on
08/10/2010 1:22:30 PM PDT by
ThomasMore
(Patrick Henry and Joe Wilson...Patriots past and present!)
To: Justaham
Why are their not criminal charges in the works? You and I would already be in custody for what he did and our assets seized.
7 posted on
08/10/2010 1:22:40 PM PDT by
doodad
To: Justaham
Waiting for the criminal prosecution by the IRS.
11 posted on
08/10/2010 1:24:00 PM PDT by
a fool in paradise
(I wish our president loved the US military as much as he loves Paul McCartney.)
To: Justaham
I dare you to do that again!
To: Justaham
No doubt this will be HEAVILY covered by the MSM as they excoriate Rangle for his arrogance and criminal behavior. BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA
To: Justaham
I fully expect Rangel and Waters to be acquitted of all charges. They will both be re-elected by landslide margins in November.
14 posted on
08/10/2010 1:27:29 PM PDT by
pnh102
(Regarding liberalism, always attribute to malice what you think can be explained by stupidity. - Me)
To: Justaham
My prediction?
Nothing will come of this. Maxine will walk too.
Sad, but there is no reason to think otherwise.
18 posted on
08/10/2010 1:29:46 PM PDT by
11Bush
To: Justaham
Charlie is playing to his constituency back home. He says what they want to hear, he is what they want him to be.
19 posted on
08/10/2010 1:31:05 PM PDT by
henkster
(A broken government does not merit full faith and credit.)
To: Justaham
I know, I know Charlie.....it's just "sloppy."
We've all heard that crock of crap word before!
21 posted on
08/10/2010 1:33:46 PM PDT by
NordP
(COMMON SENSE CONSERVATIVES - Love of Country, Less Govt, Stop Spending, No Govt Run Health Care!!!)
To: Justaham
I expel Charlie Rangel every morning.
22 posted on
08/10/2010 1:34:45 PM PDT by
RichInOC
(No! BAD Rich! (What'd I say?))
To: Justaham
Waters and Rangel know what Obama is pulling the strings of Pelosi to set this up. The Democrats have known about these corrupt two for a long time, so the question is, “Why now?”
Obama wants a chaotic situation, a crisis. He cannot stay in power and keep the Republicans from getting control of Congress without declaring martial law. He needs a reason, and black folk in poverty-ridden large cities rioting and burning city centers is a good reason.
I think Obama is trying to instigate a race war. And Charlie Rangel knows it, and maybe Maxine Waters, too.
To: Justaham
He has nothing to worry about. He never had. He enjoys inborn immunity from being held to the same standard as the rest of us.
To: Justaham
27 posted on
08/10/2010 1:45:36 PM PDT by
freekitty
(Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
To: Justaham
"It may be stupid, it may be negligent, but it's not corrupt," Rangel said in a meandering speech that lasted more than 30 minutes. Do I detect his 2010 campaign slogan? "Vote Charlie Rangel. He's not corrupt, he's just stupid."
To: Justaham
Triple dog dare them.
To: Justaham
Where is dear friend Hillary whom Charlie supported over Obamah?
Obamah, nor Hillary will return his calls.
To: Justaham
"It may be stupid, it may be negligent, but it's not corrupt," Rangel said in a meandering speech that lasted more than 30 minutes.In professing his innocence of all charges, Rangel also invited the ethics panel and House to take its shot at expelling him.
It doesnt sound like he's professing his innocence of the charges, just disputing the nature of the charges. Negligent in reporting income, he'd have gotten to it. Not criminal tax evasion. Try that one with the IRS, see where it gets you.
41 posted on
08/10/2010 2:15:46 PM PDT by
pepsi_junkie
(Who is John Galt?)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-50 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson