Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BenLurkin

In this case, the city just demolishes the building and bills the owner. It does not even bother to take the land....though, by this action, it makes it worthless.


6 posted on 08/03/2010 10:03:24 AM PDT by Captain Kirk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Captain Kirk
In the case of sale of property, demolition cost is a deduction to the market value of the land -- if the improvement has no economic value -- and particularly if demolition is needed before the property can be put to its highest and best use.

If the improvements have an economic use -- even as an interim use -- then the condemnor should be paying for the value of the improvements it is taking.

14 posted on 08/03/2010 10:17:21 AM PDT by BenLurkin (Will must be the harder, courage the bolder, spirit must be the more, as our might lessens.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson