In this case, the city just demolishes the building and bills the owner. It does not even bother to take the land....though, by this action, it makes it worthless.
In the case of sale of property, demolition cost is a deduction to the market value of the land -- if the improvement has no economic value -- and particularly if demolition is needed before the property can be put to its highest and best use.
If the improvements have an economic use -- even as an interim use -- then the condemnor should be paying for the value of the improvements it is taking.
14 posted on
08/03/2010 10:17:21 AM PDT by
BenLurkin
(Will must be the harder, courage the bolder, spirit must be the more, as our might lessens.)