To: Wonder Warthog
FWIW, I don't think we can say that just yet. I'm concerned that oil broken down by the dipersants will more easily find its way into fish and the food chain than it would've otherwise.
I'm not saying that the dispersants shouldn't have been used.
Just warning that nobody's been able to repeal the Law of Unintended Consequences :)
5 posted on
08/03/2010 5:46:20 AM PDT by
mewzilla
(Still voteless in NY-29. Over 400 roll call votes missed and counting...)
To: mewzilla
I'm concerned that oil broken down by the dipersants will more easily find its way into fish and the food chain than it would've otherwise. Oh, yes ... the petroleum will definitely find its way into the food chain, and the dispersants definitely speed the process.
Bacteria eat the petroleum. Plankton eat the bacteria. Shrimp and small fish eat the plankton. Big fish and people eat the shrimp. Big fish eat the small fish. People eat the big fish.
Yep ... happens all the time.
13 posted on
08/03/2010 6:07:25 AM PDT by
ArrogantBustard
(Western Civilization is Aborting, Buggering, and Contracepting itself out of existence.)
To: mewzilla
"I'm concerned that oil broken down by the dipersants will more easily find its way into fish and the food chain than it would've otherwise." The data presented here says that doesn't happen. Neither the dispersant nor the more toxic components in the oil simply don't stick around long enough for much in the way of bio-accumulation to happen. Too many hungry bacteria in the Gulf.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson