Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Wonder Warthog
EPA says dispersants no worse than oil alone

There are so many things wrong with this. If the dispersants aren't bad, why did BP need to use them?? And, if the oil, by itself, isn't bad what was the panic about??

I listened to another EPA dipwad on the radio this morning saying basically that the earth has already dealt with the oil; that's why no one can find it anymore. So, again, the question must be asked, what was the panic all about??



(It's a rhetorical question. After 18 months of 0bama, I KNOW the answer!)

15 posted on 08/03/2010 6:21:02 AM PDT by DustyMoment
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: DustyMoment
"There are so many things wrong with this. If the dispersants aren't bad, why did BP need to use them?? And, if the oil, by itself, isn't bad what was the panic about??"

Neither of those comments reflect what went on. NOBODY has said that the oil "wasn't bad". The whole point of using the disperants was to prevent many of the "bad effects" of oil. But what has been the propaganda all along was that the combination of oil plus dispersant was MORE toxic than the oil by itself.

"I listened to another EPA dipwad on the radio this morning saying basically that the earth has already dealt with the oil; that's why no one can find it anymore. So, again, the question must be asked, what was the panic all about??"

The "EPA dipwad" is pretty much right. And the "panic" was generated by the green socialists, which you and many others here fell for like a ton of bricks.

25 posted on 08/03/2010 6:35:22 AM PDT by Wonder Warthog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson