Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Federal judge denies Holder request to dismiss Obamacare constitutionality challenge
Washington Examiner ^ | 8/2/10 | Mark Tapscott

Posted on 08/02/2010 2:29:33 PM PDT by Nachum

Judge Henry Hudson of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia today denied the motion by the U.S. Department of Justice that Virginia’s challenge of the constitutionality of Obamacare be dismissed. Virginia Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli filed the challenge shortly after Congress completed action on the controversial measure that includes a provision requiring every American to purchase a government-approved health insurance program. (Snip) During a conference call with journalists, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebellius minimized the significance of the ruling

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonexaminer.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: denies; federal; healthcare; holder; judge; obama; obamacare; socializedmedicine

1 posted on 08/02/2010 2:29:36 PM PDT by Nachum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Nachum
Racist judge.
2 posted on 08/02/2010 2:33:02 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum ("The only stable state is the one in which all men are equal before the law." -- Aristotle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Ken Cuccinelli BUMP.


3 posted on 08/02/2010 2:36:38 PM PDT by SharpRightTurn (White, black, and red all over--America's affirmative action, metrosexual president.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

One good decision - awaiting the Supreme result and its consequences.


4 posted on 08/02/2010 2:37:21 PM PDT by Deagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

>> Racist judge.

Bambi needs to send some nightstick-wielding New Black Panthers over to the courthouse to “have a beer” with the judge.


5 posted on 08/02/2010 2:38:42 PM PDT by Nervous Tick (Eat more spinach! Make Green Jobs for America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
Need a challenge in every State.

Overwhelm the bastards.

6 posted on 08/02/2010 2:39:30 PM PDT by AU72
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AU72

Discovery !


7 posted on 08/02/2010 2:40:28 PM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks (Impeachment !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Nervous Tick
Bambi needs to send some nightstick-wielding New Black Panthers over to the courthouse to “have a beer” with the judge.

lol...sounds like a teachable moment!

8 posted on 08/02/2010 2:44:04 PM PDT by SonOfDarkSkies (Satan's greatest trick use to be convincing men he doesn't exist! But his latest novelty is Obama!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
What happened to this part of the U.S. Constitution:

Article III, Sec. 2, clause 2 (see below) says:

In all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, and those in which a State shall be Party, the Supreme Court shall have original Jurisdiction.

Why did Bolton hear this lawsuit?
9 posted on 08/02/2010 2:48:35 PM PDT by leprechaun9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
What happened to this part of the U.S. Constitution:

Article III, Sec. 2, clause 2 (see below) says:

In all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, and those in which a State shall be Party, the Supreme Court shall have original Jurisdiction.

Why did Bolton hear this lawsuit?
10 posted on 08/02/2010 2:48:46 PM PDT by leprechaun9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: leprechaun9
Why did Bolton hear this lawsuit?

Because he is sleazoid corrupt commie lawyer shill for Obama?

11 posted on 08/02/2010 2:50:30 PM PDT by Nachum (The complete Obama list at www.nachumlist.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: leprechaun9

Because Cuccinelli filed in his court.


12 posted on 08/02/2010 2:54:30 PM PDT by battlecry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Deagle

When we get Ms Kagan on the SC, the court will probably rule against us in a New York minute! I know she is replacing another liberal judge, but I don’t think he is nearly as liberal as Kagan is.


13 posted on 08/02/2010 3:05:31 PM PDT by basil (It's time to rid the country of "Gun Free Zones" aka "Killing Fields")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

VA = 1
AnnointedIdiot = 0


14 posted on 08/02/2010 3:37:54 PM PDT by cranked
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

uhhh.....are you being ‘ironic’? I hope so/-


15 posted on 08/02/2010 4:00:16 PM PDT by supremedoctrine ("Every election is like an advance auction sale of stolen goods"--H.L.Mencken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

uhhh.....are you being ‘ironic’? I hope so/-


16 posted on 08/02/2010 4:00:18 PM PDT by supremedoctrine ("Every election is like an advance auction sale of stolen goods"--H.L.Mencken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: supremedoctrine
It is racist to disagree with any "person of color."
17 posted on 08/03/2010 5:41:13 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum ("The only stable state is the one in which all men are equal before the law." -- Aristotle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson