Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: neverdem
I don't understand why medical equipment manufacturing companies spend millions on all kinds of largely useless idiot-proof labelling outside of their machines and manuals, but won't make the effort to implement simple, redundant interlock fail-safes to prevent radiation and other hazardous overdoses.

This peculiar problem is not limited to the medical equipment industry alone. I've seen the same problem with industrial equipment, as well.

4 posted on 08/01/2010 5:33:18 PM PDT by James C. Bennett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: James C. Bennett

We need to see the: “ARE YOU SURE?” prompt when outside a normal dosage.


6 posted on 08/01/2010 5:34:40 PM PDT by George from New England (Escaped CT in 2006, now living north of Tampa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: James C. Bennett
Over the years, I have read a great deal on a series of deadly malfunctions on one particular model of radiation machine: The Therac25.

A cautionary tale for anyone designing computer-controlled stuff.

13 posted on 08/01/2010 6:32:23 PM PDT by Erasmus (Personal goal: Have a bigger carbon footprint than Tony Robbins.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: James C. Bennett

I’ve seen why. Some idiot in management decides it is easier for his career to put “don’t do that” in the user’s manual than to make it impossible for the user to do that.
And the FDA accepts it as a job well done.


29 posted on 08/01/2010 9:20:42 PM PDT by ctdonath2 (+)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson