Posted on 08/01/2010 5:18:58 PM PDT by neverdem
” Reducing mistakes is important, but the bigger challenge, she said, is to eliminate unnecessary testing. “
Money quote — this, in conjunction with it being from NYT, makes this a fairly subtle Obamacare propaganda piece....
Ya gotta watch ‘em every minute, folks.....
And people always wonder why I avoid doctors like the plague.
This peculiar problem is not limited to the medical equipment industry alone. I've seen the same problem with industrial equipment, as well.
“plague”
So, if you get the plague you won’t seek a doctor?
What you don’t see are the thousands of healthy patients because of doctors for every overdose like this. Besides, who said the doctor did it? I would expect the story involved a technician/operator, not the doctor.
We need to see the: “ARE YOU SURE?” prompt when outside a normal dosage.
I know it sounds funny, but overdosing radiation is not as uncommon as one thinks it is. I remember reading about several such incidents over the past few years.
I would suggest a big read-out indicating the strength of the radiation, with a proper demarcation of the safe limits.
The “doctor” is the supervisor of the techs. This kind of thing would not happen if the doctor is paying closer attention to his employees.
I saw how unsupervised employees in a hospital literally killed my Dad. I even found him on a cold rainy late afternoon in the ICU, laying in bed with no clothes and no sheets or blankets. He was shivering extremely hard. And I could find no one watching the ICU for at least 20 minutes. When I did find someone, they couldn’t “find” any spare blankets. And this was in a very toney, expensive private hospital. The next day “Nurse Rachet” said it didn’t happen and accused me of being drunk.
They finally “got” him with their own homegrown deadly virus, staph infection.
If you happen to be a doctor or staff member, sorry for the insults. But I’ve seen way too much to trust anyone in the industry.
Articles like this are scary to me. My daughters were very sick when they were 6 weeks old, and they had CT scans (along with tons of other tests).
They are 13 now, and I wonder if there will be some other scary side effect that we are not aware of.
“And people always wonder why I avoid doctors like the plague”
I attribute my good health to a deathly fear of doctors and hospitals. My grandfather died in a hospital from a superbug he caught there during a minor procedure. My grandmother died from a nurse’s misinterpretation of a doctor’s note, leading to a fatal overdose of medicine.
A cautionary tale for anyone designing computer-controlled stuff.
My dad had such a morbid sense of humor. He always said to avoid doctors because “they’ll find a way to kill you one way or the other.”
Your kids will be fine. This is just propaganda from the new york slimes. I am a registered cat scan and mri tech. The one study that might receive high doses is an abdomen and pelvis with attention to the pancreas, and you get more radiation from sun in 3hours. I have been doing this job for 15 years since 1995. I have many of times been in the room with patients, shielded of course, and still have all my hair, no cancer. I would tell that guy to get checked out medically as to why his hair fell out. If it even happened. If you don’t believe me, check out the dosage rate from when we dropped the bombs on Japan, research is out there on radiation exposure.
The threat of being sued is why doctors order so many tests.
I'm just amazed that diagnostic radiology equipment could produce that high a radiation dose. Many of the patients appear to be relatively young. I can imagine the potential liability for the hospitals and manufacturers must be just huge.
A standard, correctly calibrated CAT scan machine is said to deliver radiation equal to 50 chest xrays. If such a machine is not calibrated properly, or operated improperly, who knows what dose might be administered?
A unit of radioactive dose resulting from exposure to electromagnetic radiation, equal to the dose that slightly reddens or browns the skin of 80% of all persons within 3 weeks after exposure; it is approximately 1000 roentgens for gamma rays, 600 roentgens for x-rays. Abbreviated SED.
I read that a CT scan normally delivers about 3-7 roentgens (or centi-Gray units). If patients skin was turning red, and hair was falling out -- this seems a much higher radiation dose than they're letting on.
The doctors are going for higher resolution - at the expense of the patient. They can just friggin' lower the dose...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.