Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

31,000 voices to U.S. House: Pull plug on Obamacare!
WorldNetDaily.com ^ | August 01, 2010 | Bob Unruh

Posted on 08/01/2010 6:33:29 AM PDT by Man50D

More than three-quarters of the needed members of the U.S. House of Representatives have signed onto a measure to have a new vote on Obamacare that essentially would allow the chamber to withdraw its approval of the law and begin the process of banishing it from American shores.

But another effort has enabled some 31,000 voices across America – so far – to offer their encouragement to members of the House who have yet to sign the discharge petition offered by Rep. Steve King, R-Iowa.

The campaign is a petition drive that urges members of Congress to repeal Obamacare because of several problems:

* Whereas, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, approved by a narrow vote of the House of Representatives earlier this year, threatens to transform the U.S. health-care system from its roots in free enterprise and personal choice;

* Whereas, the act is unconstitutional because of its unprecedented requirement that Americans purchase a service;

* Whereas, the system the law would create is financially unsustainable, places personal medical decisions in the hands of bureaucrats and is likely to lead to rationing of health-care options;

* Whereas, the act is likely to result in forcing some 87 million Americans to drop their current health-care coverage;

* Whereas, the costs involved in complying with the law are likely to cost more Americans their jobs, inhibit the creation of new employment opportunities and suppress wages…

(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 08/01/2010 6:33:32 AM PDT by Man50D
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Man50D

The Des Moines Register hates Steve King.
That makes him a star in my book.


2 posted on 08/01/2010 6:37:48 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks (Impeachment !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Man50D

BS. If 3/4 of them are saying “let’s repeal it”, then that means over 1/3 of that number should’ve read the damn thing to start with.

Election year shenanigans.


3 posted on 08/01/2010 6:39:51 AM PDT by TheZMan (Just secede and get it over with. No love lost on either side. Cya.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheZMan

“Election year shenanigans.”

***

That’s what I was thinking. The effort will hang till after the November elections, at which time it will die a quiet death.


4 posted on 08/01/2010 6:44:49 AM PDT by fatnotlazy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Man50D
"More than three-quarters of the needed members of the U.S. House of Representatives have signed onto a measure to have a new vote on Obamacare ..."

3/4? That would include a heck of a lot of Democrats. Is this true? Where is this 'measure'?

5 posted on 08/01/2010 6:50:42 AM PDT by avacado
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: avacado

3/4 of the needed members to force a vote, isn’t the same as 3/4 of the entire House.


6 posted on 08/01/2010 6:55:30 AM PDT by I_Like_Spam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Man50D

31,000 = 0.01% of the population, yea they will listen to that.

It is all a show. Nothing is going to happen. Gives them cover to go home and claim they are trying to repeal it.


7 posted on 08/01/2010 7:01:28 AM PDT by mad_as_he$$ (Playing by the rules only works if both sides do it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: I_Like_Spam

Thank you for the clarification! That does make a huge difference. I definitely read it wrong. Thanks again!


8 posted on 08/01/2010 7:18:30 AM PDT by avacado
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Man50D

This is the RAT vehicle for genocide of the elderly and disabled; a Liberal solution for reducing Social Security benefits to the masses.


9 posted on 08/01/2010 7:37:56 AM PDT by ExTexasRedhead (Take back our country on November 2, 2010.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Man50D

10 posted on 08/01/2010 7:59:51 AM PDT by relictele (Me lumen vos umbra regit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheZMan
No, not quite election year shenanigans but something more insidious:

128 House Democrats Revive the Public Option

“As the deficit continues to grow, so does the need for a program that can save billions of dollars and improve health care while doing it,” Woolsey, the co-chair of the progressive caucus, told The Washington Independent. “We are introducing the public option now so it will be available as a ready-made offset or deficit reducer in this or the next Congress.”

11 posted on 08/01/2010 8:07:39 AM PDT by EBH (Our First Right...."it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it,")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Man50D

later


12 posted on 08/01/2010 8:17:43 AM PDT by Outlaw Woman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Man50D

Whereas Obama will only negate this with his precious veto.


13 posted on 08/01/2010 10:56:26 AM PDT by Dudoight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson