Replies

Oh, and on that thread many of you were on yesterday, charging Savage as being VICIOUS.
Michael Savage’s VICIOUS Attack On Glenn Beck Over ‘Going Blind’ Revelation: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2555941/posts

I think it was a set-up by Beck supporters, in the manner that the Statist loving FReeper moles start-up anticonservative threads.

SJB knows the kind of BS I’m talking about.

The pro-Fioriana, anti-Devore mobies did this in May until we got wise and they became more subtle.

On this “Vicious” thread, the body of the post was a vanity disguised as a Youtube intro.

The Youtube itself was posted by “TheDailyBeck” and was essentially a boast that Beck had edged Savage out of #3 for the first time. And the headline was hype, because there was nothing vicious — insensitive at most, and that would be true if Beck had not been clowning about his own condition anyway (something I proved in my comments).

Within in minutes of the posting, the first 10 comments were all me-toos to the headline and the verdict on Savage.

NONE of them could have run the Youtube and then posted, because the youtube was just under 5 minutes long.

And none of them responded to this comment I left that I pinged them to: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2555941/posts?page=193#193