Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CREW Files Ethics Complaint Against NY Rep. Gregory Meeks
Financial Post ^ | July 13, 2010 | News Release

Posted on 07/13/2010 9:15:04 AM PDT by jazusamo

Today, Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) filed a complaint with the Office of Congressional Ethics (OCE) against Rep. Gregory Meeks (D-NY), alleging he violated federal law and House rules by accepting $40,000 from a New York businessman and failing to include it on his personal financial disclosure reports (PFDs).

CREW’s complaint is based on a series of articles by the New York Daily News reporting that Rep. Meeks received $40,000 from Ed Ahmad in 2007. Although Rep. Meeks now calls the money a loan, he received the funds without offering collateral, and without an interest rate, repayment plan, or due date. Rep. Meeks failed to make any payments on the loan for 3 years and failed to include it on either his 2007 or 2008 PFDs. He repaid the money, with 12.5% interest, only after the FBI questioned Mr. Ahmad about it, and Mr. Ahmad requested repayment. Rep. Meeks said his failure to report the loan was an “oversight.”

Rep. Meeks described the loan to the Daily News as necessary “for my family obligations, etc. I was in a new house. It’s taking care of things for my family needs in the house (sic).” He continued, “You need to make sure the house is furnished. You need things.”

To repay Mr. Ahmad, Rep. Meeks took out a $59,650 home equity loan from Four Investments, an investment firm owned by Dennis Mehiel, another New York businessman and a longtime Democratic donor. Notably, Four Investments has made no other such loans in New York, but Mr. Mehiel and his wife have donated $9,600 to Rep. Meeks during the 2010 election cycle.

CREW’s complaint alleges that by knowingly failing to report the $40,000 he received from Mr. Ahmad on his PFDs in 2007 and 2008, Rep. Meeks made false statements in violation of federal law, a felony punishable by up to 5 years in jail. CREW also alleges that by taking the $40,000 Rep. Meeks violated the House gift rule, which prohibits members of Congress and staff from accepting most gifts.

Even if – as seems unlikely – the $40,000 was a loan, House rules prohibit members from accepting personal loans not made on commercially reasonable terms, which this loan clearly was not. Further, House rules indicate that members should seek Ethics Committee approval before accepting such loans, something Rep. Meeks admitted he did not do.

CREW also alleges the $59,650 home equity loan made by Four Investments to Rep. Meeks constitutes an impermissible gift because members may accept loans from financial institutions only on terms available to the general public. Since Four Investments does not make home equity loans, the loan Rep. Meeks received is obviously not widely available.

CREW Executive Director Melanie Sloan stated, “Rep. Meeks got caught with his hand in the cookie jar and came up with an after-the-fact explanation to justify his conduct. Too bad for him, his story doesn’t hold water. The real questions now are what did Rep. Meeks do for Mr. Ahmad in return for the money and exactly what is Congress going to do about this?”

Click here to read CREW’s letter to the OCE and click here to read the letter’s accompanying exhibits.

Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) is a non-profit legal watchdog group dedicated to holding public officials accountable for their actions. For more information, please visit www.citizensforethics.org or contact Peter Bjork at 202.408.5565 or pbjork@citizensforethics.org.



TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Government
KEYWORDS: 111th; cbc; crew; cultureofcorruption; ethics; ethicscomplaint; gregorymeeks; meeks; oce; pelosi
Ironic that CREW filed the complaint with the Office of Congressional Ethis, Meeks and others in the Congressional Black Caucus have pressured Pelosi to gut the relatively new OCE's powers.
1 posted on 07/13/2010 9:15:09 AM PDT by jazusamo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

A committee for an oxymoron? Ethics in Washington? Please


2 posted on 07/13/2010 9:19:14 AM PDT by wastedyears (The Founders revolted for less.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
$50 says Meeks claims the action against him has a racist tinge.
3 posted on 07/13/2010 9:52:35 AM PDT by AlphaOneAlpha
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

$50 says Meeks claims the action against him has a racist tinge.


4 posted on 07/13/2010 9:52:51 AM PDT by AlphaOneAlpha
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AlphaOneAlpha

No doubt you’re right.

I think he’s starting to squirm a bit. It’s not just this ethics complaint that was a long time coming, the FBI is also investigating him on this and another thing.


5 posted on 07/13/2010 10:04:03 AM PDT by jazusamo (But there really is no free lunch, except in the world of political rhetoric,.: Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

No doubt the complainants will be found to lack standing.


6 posted on 07/13/2010 10:13:04 AM PDT by Sgt_Schultze (A half-truth is a complete lie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sgt_Schultze

CREW is a left leaning group but they’ve gone after Dems in the past, Murtha was one they wrote a lot about.


7 posted on 07/13/2010 10:17:24 AM PDT by jazusamo (But there really is no free lunch, except in the world of political rhetoric,.: Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson