Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Holder: Ariz. Law Inconsistent with Federal Law (Yep, one law is enforced and the other isn't)
CBS ^ | 7/11/2010 | Stephanie Condon

Posted on 07/11/2010 7:54:23 AM PDT by tobyhill

In an exclusive interview with CBS News chief Washington correspondent Bob Schieffer on CBS' "Face the Nation," Attorney General Eric Holder said the Justice Department is challenging Arizona's controversial new immigration law in court because it is inconsistent with, and is preempted by, federal law.

"What we're saying is that they cannot pass laws that are inconsistent with the federal laws, or do things that contravene federal policy when it comes to the enforcement of our immigration laws," Holder said. "And the Arizona statute, if you look at the guts of it, really puts in place a whole variety of things that are inconsistent with what we have decided to do as a federal government."

The Arizona law in question makes it a state crime for a person to be in the country illegally. It requires local law enforcement during all "lawful stops" to question a person about his or her immigration status if there is "reasonable suspicion" that person may be in the country illegally. Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer called the federal suit against the law "outrageous" and has vowed to fight it.

(Excerpt) Read more at cbsnews.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aliens; arizona; democrats; holder; illegalimmigration; obama; obamanation
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last

1 posted on 07/11/2010 7:54:24 AM PDT by tobyhill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

Has he even read the law yet?


2 posted on 07/11/2010 7:55:52 AM PDT by Godzilla ( 3-7-77)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill
What we're saying is that they cannot pass laws that are inconsistent with the federal laws, or do things that contravene federal policy when it comes to the enforcement of our immigration laws," Holder said.

Arizona enforces.

The FedGuv doesn't.

That;s the inconsistency.

3 posted on 07/11/2010 7:57:31 AM PDT by Lazamataz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

A “tax cheat” is saying these things!


4 posted on 07/11/2010 7:57:51 AM PDT by johnthebaptistmoore (If leftist legislation that's already in place really can't be ended by non-leftists, then what?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Godzilla

He doesn’t need to read the law!

” or do things that contravene federal policy”

The “federal policy” is to ignore the federal law, therefore,,,,,,,,,,


5 posted on 07/11/2010 7:59:18 AM PDT by Dr. Bogus Pachysandra ( Ya can't pick up a turd by the clean end!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

Worthless interview. No follow up questions explaining HOW it is inconsistent, precisely. Just a bunch of Big Fat Claims with no supporting evidence.

It is a worthless interview, as is Holder himself.


6 posted on 07/11/2010 7:59:40 AM PDT by RobRoy (The US Today: Revelation 18:4)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

Of course Bob Schiester gave plenty of time for the opposing view, being an objective destorer and all.

Pray for America


7 posted on 07/11/2010 8:01:19 AM PDT by bray (Did Rush say Massive Failure?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: johnthebaptistmoore
A “tax cheat” is saying these things!

If the feds were enforcing the law he'd be in jail. Along with the other traitors and scum in this administration.

8 posted on 07/11/2010 8:03:09 AM PDT by unixfox (Abolish Slavery, Repeal The 16th Amendment!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill
"And the Arizona statute, if you look at the guts of it, really puts in place a whole variety of things that are inconsistent with what we have decided to do as a federal government."

Well, he can't tell you the part where what "we" have decided to do as a federal government is nothing, as a means of protecting Mexico's elite families and their considerable assets against the threat of a Communist revolution. And he really can't tell you that the Democrats are just maintaining GHWB-era policy on immigration, due to all the cash from those elites, the cartels, and others flowing into US political coffers to maintain the status quo.

Viewed in that light, the Arizona law is rather gauche - it's stepping on an agreement made long ago by Arizona's betters in places like Hyannisport and Kennebunkport...and just who do these redneck cowboys think they are? :)

9 posted on 07/11/2010 8:03:20 AM PDT by Mr. Jeeves ( "The right to offend is far more important than any right not to be offended." - Rowan Atkinson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

He’s an idiot and proving more and more everyday that he’s where he is because of QUOTAS and diversity.

In the real world, I don’t think this clown could hold down a real job.


10 posted on 07/11/2010 8:03:28 AM PDT by boycott (CAL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

The Obama Administration and Justice Department aren’t having very good luck with their lawsuits. There is a reason for that: They lie to the public and the courts know the truth from the lies.


11 posted on 07/11/2010 8:04:01 AM PDT by TommyDale (Independent - I already left the GOP because they were too liberal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TommyDale

I know, he’s really wants his Black Panthers to enforce the border so it’ll be a twofer


12 posted on 07/11/2010 8:10:59 AM PDT by SanFranDan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

The only difference is that the DemoCriminals refuse to obey or enforce the Laws of the Land. They are criminals and won’t ruin each others criminal acts.


13 posted on 07/11/2010 8:11:28 AM PDT by DGHoodini (Iran Azadi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

Tell it to the judge NewBlackPantherBoy.


14 posted on 07/11/2010 8:16:55 AM PDT by TheLawyerFormerlyKnownAsAl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

holder is fighting for democrat voters(illegals) instead of protecting US citizens and enforcing the laws of the land.


15 posted on 07/11/2010 8:21:50 AM PDT by dalebert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dalebert

I say have at it. Let’s test the law in courts. Then we’ll see who is right and who is wrong.

This is pure unadulterated BS politics.


16 posted on 07/11/2010 8:25:12 AM PDT by nikos1121 (Praying for minus 24 today....at least minus 23...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

“..if you look at the guts of it, really puts in place a whole variety of things that are inconsistent with what we have decided to do as a federal government.” “

Thing is, Mr. Holder, you don’t decide what is law you administer WRITTEN law.


17 posted on 07/11/2010 8:26:20 AM PDT by TalBlack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

The comments on the CBS sight are pretty interesting.


18 posted on 07/11/2010 8:27:58 AM PDT by La Lydia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill
"And the Arizona statute, if you look at the guts of it, really puts in place a whole variety of things that are inconsistent with what we have decided to do as a federal government."

And they are?

19 posted on 07/11/2010 8:35:07 AM PDT by cardinal4 (Can someone explain what a "Diversity Job" is?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill
"What we're saying is that they cannot pass laws that are inconsistent with the federal laws, or do things that contravene federal policy when it comes to the enforcement of our immigration laws," Holder said. "And the Arizona statute, if you look at the guts of it, really puts in place a whole variety of things that are inconsistent with what we have decided to do as a federal government."

That sums it up quite nicely - the FEDs, notwithstanding their oath to uphold the laws of the nation, ARE NOT ABOUT TO ENFORCE THE IMMIGRATION LAWS OR SECURE THE BORDER - all this just a few years after we were attacked.

CAN ANYONE SAY TREASON?
20 posted on 07/11/2010 8:36:35 AM PDT by Cheerio (Barry Hussein Soetoro-0bama=The Complete Destruction of American Capitalism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson