Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Concerns Spread over Environmental Costs of Producing Shale Gas
Scientific American ^ | July 9, 2010 | Joel Kirkland

Posted on 07/10/2010 2:30:15 PM PDT by Willie Green

PITTSBURGH—Around suppertime on June 3 in Clearfield County, a geyser of natural gas and sludge began shooting out of a well called Punxsutawney Hunting Club 36. The toxic stew of gas, salt water, mud and chemicals went 75 feet into the air for 16 hours. Some of this mess seeped into a stream northeast of Pittsburgh.

Four days later, as authorities were cleaning up the debris in Pennsylvania, an explosion burned seven workers at a gas well on the site of an abandoned coal mine outside of Moundsville, W.Va., just southwest of Pittsburgh.

The back-to-back emergencies were like a five-alarm fire for John Hanger, secretary of the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection. For a brief moment, the cable news channels turned their attention away from the BP PLC oil gusher in the Gulf of Mexico to the apparent trouble in the nation's expanding onshore natural gas fields.

The events added force to a tough public debate in Pennsylvania and New York and across northern Appalachia about how the environmental impacts of gas drilling balance against the economic benefits of gas and the role it could play in helping electric utilities transition to cleaner fuels.

When used to fire up a power plant, natural gas produces less air pollutants and half of the greenhouse gas emissions produced by conventional coal plants. But extracting the gas from deep sedimentary rock and shipping it to consumers is an industrial process. It requires massive amounts of water and reliable cement and pipe jobs. It also has wastewater-disposal issues and generates air pollution.

"This is a test for people in public life," Hanger says. "Do you get into public service to treat the gas industry fairly and protect our resources, or not? You don't have to choose between producing the gas and protecting our water."

(Excerpt) Read more at scientificamerican.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; US: New York; US: Pennsylvania
KEYWORDS: fracking; hydrofracking; hydrofracturing; marcellus; shalegas
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-22 last
To: Gorzaloon

Active construction projects for new nuclear plants are on-going in several states (dirt is being moved).


21 posted on 07/12/2010 10:32:51 AM PDT by bagman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: bagman
Glad to hear it! The only operating reactor in my state was built in 1972.

I am not saying the turbines drive an overhead jackshaft with flopping leather belts, but it is getting on in years.

670MW.

22 posted on 07/12/2010 11:29:50 AM PDT by Gorzaloon (CNN:AP:etc:Today, President Obama's stool was firm and well-formed. One end was slightly pointed. ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-22 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson