[Comstock1]

When this started, the FB page was unknown to me and was not referenced in any way by you. You are taking advantage of information that has appeared to you after the fact to try and bolster your arguments. That still doesn’t change the incorrectness of your statements based on the facts as then known.

Having seen the additional information, however, doesn’t change the fact that so far everything presented is ALL FROM ONE SIDE.

I DO NOT DISPUTE THE TRUTH OF THE STATEMENTS, just that making a judgement (as many of you have) before other evidence is presented (much less analyzed) is irrational.

[Eaker]

That still doesn’t change the incorrectness of your statements based on the facts as then known.

I knew about this incident before TheMom posted this thread. You were the one posting out of ignorance not me.